Literature DB >> 21308360

The Crystalloid versus Hydroxyethyl Starch Trial: protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial of fluid resuscitation with 6% hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4) compared to 0.9% sodium chloride (saline) in intensive care patients on mortality.

.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The intravenous fluid 6% hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4) (6% HES 130/0.4) is used widely for resuscitation but there is limited information on its efficacy and safety. A large-scale multi-centre randomised controlled trial (CHEST) in critically ill patients is currently underway comparing fluid resuscitation with 6% HES 130/0.4 to 0.9% sodium chloride on 90-day mortality and other clinically relevant outcomes including renal injury. This report describes the study protocol.
METHODS: CHEST will recruit 7,000 patients to concealed, random, parallel assignment of either 6% HES 130/0.4 or 0.9% sodium chloride for all fluid resuscitation needs whilst in the intensive care unit (ICU). The primary outcome will be all-cause mortality at 90 days post-randomisation. Secondary outcomes will include incident renal injury, other organ failures, ICU and hospital mortality, length of ICU stay, quality of life at 6 months, health economic analyses and in patients with traumatic brain injury, functional outcome. Subgroup analyses will be conducted in four predefined subgroups. All analyses will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: The study run-in phase has been completed and the main trial commenced in April 2010. CHEST should generate results that will inform and influence prescribing of this commonly used resuscitation fluid.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21308360     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-010-2117-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  25 in total

1.  EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life.

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Influences on physicians' choices of intravenous colloids.

Authors:  Michael S Miletin; Thomas E Stewart; Peter G Norton
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2002-05-30       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  International albumin use: 1995 to 2006.

Authors:  D Jones; S McEvoy; T M Merz; A Higgins; R Bellomo; J D Cooper; S Hollis; C McArthur; J A Myburgh; C Taylor; B Liu; R Norton; S Finfer
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.669

Review 4.  Analyzing outcome of treatment of severe head injury: a review and update on advancing the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale.

Authors:  G M Teasdale; L E Pettigrew; J T Wilson; G Murray; B Jennett
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Influence of two different volume replacement regimens on renal function in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery: comparison of a new starch preparation with gelatin.

Authors:  Joachim Boldt; Thorsten Brenner; Andreas Lehmann; Johannes Lang; Bernhard Kumle; Christiane Werling
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Saline or albumin for fluid resuscitation in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  John Myburgh; D James Cooper; Simon Finfer; Rinaldo Bellomo; Robyn Norton; Nicole Bishop; Sing Kai Lo; Shirley Vallance
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of a multicenter, prospective study. Working group on "sepsis-related problems" of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

Authors:  J L Vincent; A de Mendonça; F Cantraine; R Moreno; J Takala; P M Suter; C L Sprung; F Colardyn; S Blecher
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 8.  Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) versus other fluid therapies: effects on kidney function.

Authors:  Allison B Dart; Thomas C Mutter; Chelsea A Ruth; Shayne P Taback
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

Review 9.  Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients.

Authors:  P Perel; I Roberts
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-10-17

10.  Intensive insulin therapy and pentastarch resuscitation in severe sepsis.

Authors:  Frank M Brunkhorst; Christoph Engel; Frank Bloos; Andreas Meier-Hellmann; Max Ragaller; Norbert Weiler; Onnen Moerer; Matthias Gruendling; Michael Oppert; Stefan Grond; Derk Olthoff; Ulrich Jaschinski; Stefan John; Rolf Rossaint; Tobias Welte; Martin Schaefer; Peter Kern; Evelyn Kuhnt; Michael Kiehntopf; Christiane Hartog; Charles Natanson; Markus Loeffler; Konrad Reinhart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Randomised trials of 6% tetrastarch (hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 or 0.42) for severe sepsis reporting mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amit Patel; Umeer Waheed; Stephen J Brett
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  0.9 % saline vs 6 % HES 130/0.4 for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Giulia Nenna; Giorgio Costantino
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 3.  Sepsis in a Panorama: What the Cardiovascular Physician Should Know.

Authors:  Deepa B Gotur
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

4.  Assessment of hemodynamic efficacy and safety of 6% hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4 vs. 0.9% NaCl fluid replacement in patients with severe sepsis: the CRYSTMAS study.

Authors:  Bertrand Guidet; Olivier Martinet; Thierry Boulain; Francois Philippart; Jean François Poussel; Julien Maizel; Xavier Forceville; Marc Feissel; Michel Hasselmann; Alexandra Heininger; Hugo Van Aken
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Is hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 safe?

Authors:  Nicolai Haase; Anders Perner
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Research studies that have influenced practice of neuroanesthesiology in recent years: A literature review.

Authors:  Nidhi Gupta; Mihir P Pandia; Hari Hara Dash
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2013-03

Review 7.  Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine 2011. II. Cardiovascular, infections, pneumonia and sepsis, critical care organization and outcome, education, ultrasonography, metabolism and coagulation.

Authors:  Massimo Antonelli; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; J Randall Curtis; Daniel De Backer; Goran Hedenstierna; Michael Joannidis; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Jean-Charles Preiser; Patricia Rocco; Jean-François Timsit; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  A Novel Risk Prediction Model for Severe Acute Kidney Injury in Intensive Care Unit Patients Receiving Fluid Resuscitation.

Authors:  Yunlin Feng; Qiang Li; Simon Finfer; John Myburgh; Rinaldo Bellomo; Vlado Perkovic; Meg Jardine; Amanda Y Wang; Martin Gallagher
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-18

9.  Higher vs. lower fluid volume for septic shock: clinical characteristics and outcome in unselected patients in a prospective, multicenter cohort.

Authors:  Søren H Smith; Anders Perner
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Michael W Pritchard; David Jw Evans; Andrew R Butler; Phil Alderson; Andrew F Smith; Ian Roberts
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-08-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.