Literature DB >> 12121743

Effects of noise and cue enhancement on neural responses to speech in auditory midbrain, thalamus and cortex.

Jenna Cunningham1, Trent Nicol, Cynthia King, Steven G Zecker, Nina Kraus.   

Abstract

Speech perception depends on the auditory system's ability to extract relevant acoustic features from competing background noise. Despite widespread acknowledgement that noise exacerbates this process, little is known about the neurophysiologic mechanisms underlying the encoding of speech in noise. Moreover, the relative contribution of different brain nuclei to these processes has not been fully established. To address these issues, aggregate neural responses were recorded from within the inferior colliculus, medial geniculate body and over primary auditory cortex of anesthetized guinea pigs to a synthetic vowel-consonant-vowel syllable /ada/ in quiet and in noise. In noise the onset response to the stop consonant /d/ was reduced or eliminated at each level, to the greatest degree in primary auditory cortex. Acoustic cue enhancements characteristic of 'clear' speech (lengthening the stop gap duration and increasing the intensity of the release burst) improved the neurophysiologic representation of the consonant at each level, especially at the cortex. Finally, the neural encoding of the vowel segment was evident at subcortical levels only, and was more resistant to noise than encoding of the dynamic portion of the consonant (release burst and formant transition). This experiment sheds light on which speech-sound elements are poorly represented in noise and demonstrates how acoustic modifications to the speech signal can improve neural responses in a normal auditory system. Implications for understanding neurophysiologic auditory signal processing in children with perceptual impairments and the design of efficient perceptual training strategies are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12121743     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(02)00344-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  16 in total

1.  A possible role for a paralemniscal auditory pathway in the coding of slow temporal information.

Authors:  Daniel A Abrams; Trent Nicol; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Different timescales for the neural coding of consonant and vowel sounds.

Authors:  Claudia A Perez; Crystal T Engineer; Vikram Jakkamsetti; Ryan S Carraway; Matthew S Perry; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Frequency-following response among neonates with progressive moderate hyperbilirubinemia.

Authors:  Gabriella Musacchia; Jiong Hu; Vinod K Bhutani; Ronald J Wong; Mei-Ling Tong; Shuping Han; Nikolas H Blevins; Matthew B Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.521

4.  Inferior colliculus contributions to phase encoding of stop consonants in an animal model.

Authors:  Catherine M Warrier; Daniel A Abrams; Trent G Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Speech-evoked auditory brainstem response; electrophysiological evidence of upper brainstem facilitative role on sound lateralization in noise.

Authors:  Abdollah Moossavi; Yones Lotfi; Mohanna Javanbakht; Soghrat Faghihzadeh
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.307

6.  Increasing diversity of neural responses to speech sounds across the central auditory pathway.

Authors:  K G Ranasinghe; W A Vrana; C J Matney; M P Kilgard
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Auditory-neurophysiological responses to speech during early childhood: Effects of background noise.

Authors:  Travis White-Schwoch; Evan C Davies; Elaine C Thompson; Kali Woodruff Carr; Trent Nicol; Ann R Bradlow; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Neural mechanisms supporting robust discrimination of spectrally and temporally degraded speech.

Authors:  Kamalini G Ranasinghe; William A Vrana; Chanel J Matney; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-05-02

9.  Reading and subcortical auditory function.

Authors:  Karen Banai; Jane Hornickel; Erika Skoe; Trent Nicol; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 10.  The scalp-recorded brainstem response to speech: neural origins and plasticity.

Authors:  Bharath Chandrasekaran; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.