Literature DB >> 12121680

Neither high-pass filtering nor mathematical differentiation of the EMG signals can considerably reduce cross-talk.

N A Dimitrova1, G V Dimitrov, O A Nikitin.   

Abstract

Using mathematical simulation of motor unit potentials (MUPs), detected by a point and rectangular plate electrode, we have shown that the muscle tissue does not act like a low-pass frequency filter on MUPs. Depending on the electrode type and its longitudinal position, the relative weight of the terminal phases (reflecting the excitation extinction) in MUPs and thus of high frequencies in the MUP power spectrum, increase with the MU depth. Therefore, high-pass filtering or differentiating signals detected neither monopolarly nor bipolarly could eliminate the cross-talk produced by high frequency components of MUPs from deep MUs. Such methods could be effective against the main components but not against the MUP leading edge and terminal phases. To reduce the cross-talk, position of the detecting electrodes should correspond to anatomy of muscles producing the cross-talk. Monopolar electrode should be located above the ends of the muscles. Cross-talk of the muscles located beyond the muscle of interest could be higher than that produced above the end-plate of deep muscles. On the contrary, under detection by a longitudinal bipolar electrode, the cross-talk is much smaller above the end-plate region or beyond deep muscles. The cross-talk is the greatest above the ends of the deep muscles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12121680     DOI: 10.1016/s1050-6411(02)00008-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol        ISSN: 1050-6411            Impact factor:   2.368


  16 in total

1.  Single motor unit analysis from spatially filtered surface electromyogram signals. Part 2: conduction velocity estimation.

Authors:  E Schulte; D Farina; G Rau; R Merletti; C Disselhorst-Klug
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Comparison of spatial filter selectivity in surface myoelectric signal detection: influence of the volume conductor model.

Authors:  D Farina; L Mesin; S Martina; R Merletti
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  A simulation study for a surface EMG sensor that detects distinguishable motor unit action potentials.

Authors:  Jin Lee; Alexander Adam; Carlo J De Luca
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Periodic increases in force during sustained contraction reduce fatigue and facilitate spatial redistribution of trapezius muscle activity.

Authors:  Deborah Falla; Dario Farina
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Epoch length to accurately estimate the amplitude of interference EMG is likely the result of unavoidable amplitude cancellation.

Authors:  Kevin G Keenan; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Journal:  Biomed Signal Process Control       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.880

6.  Effects of muscle fibre shortening on the characteristics of surface motor unit potentials.

Authors:  Javier Rodriguez-Falces; Nicolas Place
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Predicting electromyographic signals under realistic conditions using a multiscale chemo-electro-mechanical finite element model.

Authors:  Mylena Mordhorst; Thomas Heidlauf; Oliver Röhrle
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 3.906

8.  Peculiarities of extracellular potentials produced by deep muscles. Part 1: single fibre potential fields.

Authors:  T I Arabadzhiev
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Peculiarities of extracellular potentials produced by deep muscles. Part 2: motor unit potentials.

Authors:  T I Arabadzhiev
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 10.  The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG: an update.

Authors:  Dario Farina; Roberto Merletti; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2014-10-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.