Literature DB >> 12121622

Color and luminance contrasts attract independent attention.

Maria Concetta Morrone1, Valentina Denti, Donatella Spinelli.   

Abstract

Paying attention can improve vision in many ways, including some very basic functions such as contrast discrimination, a task that probably reflects very early levels of visual processing. Electrophysiological, psychophysical, and imaging studies on humans as well as single recordings in monkey show that attention can modulate the neuronal response at an early stage of visual processing, probably by acting on the response gain. Here, we measure incremental contrast thresholds for luminance and color stimuli to derive the contrast response of early neural mechanisms and their modulation by attention. We show that, for both cases, attention improves contrast discrimination, probably by multiplicatively increasing the gain of the neuronal response to contrast. However, the effects of attention are highly specific to the visual modality: concurrent attention to a competing luminance, but not chromatic pattern, greatly impedes luminance contrast discrimination; and attending to a competing chromatic, but not luminance, task impedes color contrast discrimination. Thus, the effects of attention are highly modality specific, implying separate attentional resources for different fundamental visual attributes at early stages of visual processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12121622     DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00921-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  35 in total

1.  The effect of attention on neuronal responses to high and low contrast stimuli.

Authors:  Joonyeol Lee; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Loss of visual information in neglect: the effect of chromatic- versus luminance-contrast stimuli in a "what" task.

Authors:  Sabrina Pitzalis; Francesco Di Russo; Donatella Spinelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Separate attentional resources for vision and audition.

Authors:  David Alais; Concetta Morrone; David Burr
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Fusion of visual and auditory stimuli during saccades: a Bayesian explanation for perisaccadic distortions.

Authors:  Paola Binda; Aurelio Bruno; David C Burr; Maria C Morrone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The perceptual consequences of the attentional bias: evidence for distractor removal.

Authors:  Matthias Niemeier; Vaughan V W Singh; Matthew Keough; Nadine Akbar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Foveal analysis and peripheral selection during active visual sampling.

Authors:  Casimir J H Ludwig; J Rhys Davies; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Changing the spatial scope of attention alters patterns of neural gain in human cortex.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Javier O Garcia; Nuttida Rungratsameetaweemana; Thomas C Sprague; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Visual attention: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Oculomotor responses and visuospatial perceptual judgments compete for common limited resources.

Authors:  Marc S Tibber; Simon Grant; Michael J Morgan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Dynamic sensitivity of area V4 neurons during saccade preparation.

Authors:  Xue Han; Sherry X Xian; Tirin Moore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.