Literature DB >> 15654582

Loss of visual information in neglect: the effect of chromatic- versus luminance-contrast stimuli in a "what" task.

Sabrina Pitzalis1, Francesco Di Russo, Donatella Spinelli.   

Abstract

One to four vertical bars were tachistoscopically presented at various eccentricities along the horizontal meridian to patients with right brain damage and neglect (n=7) and to a control group of right brain damaged patients without neglect (n=4). Luminance contrast stimuli and isoluminant chromatic contrast stimuli were used. The patients' task was to report the number of bars. With luminance stimuli the neglect patients' discrimination in the left visual field was reduced, particularly at the most leftward position tested (ca 20 degrees ) where about 20% of the bars were omitted. The loss of information was limited to luminance contrast stimuli. When chromatic contrast stimuli were used, accuracy was comparable in the two hemifields and between groups of patients. The differential pattern of results for chromatic and luminance contrast stimuli is consistent with the hypothesis of a selective deficit of the magno-cellular pathway in neglect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15654582     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2207-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  39 in total

1.  Spatial anisotropy of saccadic latency in normal subjects and brain-damaged patients.

Authors:  S Pitzalis; F Di Russo
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Automatic gain control contrast mechanisms are modulated by attention in humans: evidence from visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  F Di Russo; D Spinelli; M C Morrone
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Attentional inhibition of visual processing in human striate and extrastriate cortex.

Authors:  Scott D Slotnick; Jens Schwarzbach; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Source analysis of event-related cortical activity during visuo-spatial attention.

Authors:  Francesco Di Russo; Antigona Martínez; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing.

Authors:  L M Trick; Z W Pylyshyn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 6.  Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth.

Authors:  M S Livingstone; D H Hubel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Functional analysis of the periphery effect in human building related areas.

Authors:  Ifat Levy; Uri Hasson; Michal Harel; Rafael Malach
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Effects of illusory spatial anisometry in unilateral neglect.

Authors:  Raffaella Ricci; Lorenzo Pia; Patrizia Gindri
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The anatomy of unilateral neglect after right-hemisphere stroke lesions. A clinical/CT-scan correlation study in man.

Authors:  G Vallar; D Perani
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Oculomotor disorders in cortical lesions in man: the role of unilateral neglect.

Authors:  F Girotti; M Casazza; M Musicco; G Avanzini
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  3 in total

1.  The perceptual consequences of the attentional bias: evidence for distractor removal.

Authors:  Matthias Niemeier; Vaughan V W Singh; Matthew Keough; Nadine Akbar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Magnocellular and parvocellular influences on reflexive attention.

Authors:  Anthony J Ries; Joseph B Hopfinger
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Visually guided, aimed movements can be unaffected by stimulus-response uncertainty.

Authors:  Charles E Wright; Valerie F Marino; Shane A Belovsky; Charles Chubb
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 2.064

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.