Literature DB >> 12117023

Is there a difference between the management of grade 2b and 3 corrosive gastric injuries?

Chittinad Havanond1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the differences between treatment of patients with grade 2b or grade 3 gastric injuries.
SETTING: A University Hospital.
DESIGN: Retrospective review. PATIENTS: Thirty patients who ingested caustic agents over a 5 year period were examined by endoscope within 48 hours of injury. RESULT: Twenty one patients ingested strong acid or alkali. Among these patients, five had grade 2b, and two had grade 3 injuries. In both cases of grade 3 injuries, extensive surgical approach was initially performed, then delayed jejunal and colonic interpositions were done. On the other hand, one 2b patient had exploratory laparotomy, while others were treated conservatively. All 2b patients had satisfactory conditions during the initial follow-ups. Three patients were healthy during the 11, 16, and 44 months follow-up, one developed chronic gastritis at 5 months and one patient failed to follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Early and aggressive extensive removal of necrotic tissue is necessary and can certainly increase the survival. There is on going controversy in the management of injuries less than grade 3. Grade 2b gastric injury patients can be managed conservatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12117023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai        ISSN: 0125-2208


  9 in total

Review 1.  Caustic injury of the upper gastrointestinal tract: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Sandro Contini; Carmelo Scarpignato
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Risk Factors for Esophageal Stricture in Grade 2b and 3a Corrosive Esophageal Injuries.

Authors:  Prasit Mahawongkajit; Prakitpunthu Tomtitchong; Nuttorn Boochangkool; Palin Limpavitayaporn; Amonpon Kanlerd; Chatchai Mingmalairak; Surajit Awsakulsutthi; Chittinad Havanond
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  The Surgical Strategy in Massive Corrosive Injury in Digestive Tract: Is the Extensive Surgery Appropriate?

Authors:  Yung-Hung Chang; Chih-Ying Chien; Chih-Chi Chen; Chih-Yuan Fu; Chi-Hsun Hsieh; Chien-Hung Liao
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Assessment and management after corrosive ingestion: when is specialist centre referral needed? A 10-year UK experience.

Authors:  Francesco Di Maggio; Vittoria Vergani; Ivan Tomasi; Chuan Zhang; James Gossage; Abrie Botha; Cara Baker
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.453

5.  Surgical management of esophageal strictures after caustic burns: a 30 years of experience.

Authors:  Yong Han; Qing-Shu Cheng; Xiao-Fei Li; Xiao-Ping Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Clinical evaluation and management of caustic injury in the upper gastrointestinal tract in 95 adult patients in an urban medical center.

Authors:  Gen Tohda; Choichi Sugawa; Christopher Gayer; Akiko Chino; Timothy W McGuire; Charles E Lucas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-27       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Comparison of Preoperative CT Colonography and Colonoscopy for Esophageal Reconstruction with Colonic Interposition.

Authors:  Prasit Mahawongkajit; Nuttorn Boochangkool
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2020-11-16

8.  The Effect of the COVID-19 on Corrosive Ingestion in Thailand.

Authors:  Chatbadin Thongchuam; Prasit Mahawongkajit; Amonpon Kanlerd
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2021-07-06

9.  NUTRITIONAL THERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE CORROSIVE INTOXICATION IN ADULTS.

Authors:  Andon Chibishev; Velo Markoski; Ivica Smokovski; Emilija Shikole; Aleksandra Stevcevska
Journal:  Mater Sociomed       Date:  2016-01-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.