Literature DB >> 35411459

Assessment and management after corrosive ingestion: when is specialist centre referral needed? A 10-year UK experience.

Francesco Di Maggio1, Vittoria Vergani2,3, Ivan Tomasi3, Chuan Zhang2, James Gossage2, Abrie Botha2, Cara Baker2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Corrosive ingestion injuries are rare but clinically significant events, potentially associated with high morbidity and mortality. The low volume of cases limits guideline development. We report a 10-year experience of our tertiary centre focusing on cases requiring specialist care.
METHODS: All adults treated following corrosive ingestion between 2010 and 2020 were included. Blood results, imaging and endoscopic findings were reviewed. Patients were stratified based on endoscopic findings. Emergency and delayed management was analysed along with short and long-term outcomes. Predictive value of early outcome indicators was investigated.
RESULTS: Eighty-one patients were included, with an average follow-up of 5 years. Patients with injuries ≤ Zargar 2A (n = 15) had long-term outcomes similar to the ones with negative endoscopic findings (n = 51). All fifteen patients suffering injuries Zargar ≥ 2B required ITU and four died (26.6%). All deaths occurred within 50 days of ingestion, had Zargar grade ≥ 3 and airway involvement. Five patients (33%) required emergency operations, two of which died. All Zargar ≥ 2B injury survivors (n = 11) developed strictures and/or tracheo-esophageal fistulae (18%), required multiple admissions and prolonged nutritional support; five required delayed resections. Zargar grade ≥ 2B, airway damage, and increased CRP on admission correlated with unfavourable outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Corrosive ingestion injuries up to Zargar 2A do not cause long-term sequelae and can be managed locally. Injuries > 2B bear high mortality and will cause sequelae. Early identification of severe injuries and transfer to specialist centres with multidisciplinary ITU, OG, thoracic and ENT expertise is recommended.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caustic ingestion; Endoscopic dilatation; Oesophageal perforation; Oesophageal reconstruction; Transmural necrosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35411459     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09174-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   3.453


  4 in total

1.  Corrosive injury to upper gastrointestinal tract: Still a major surgical dilemma.

Authors:  Siew Min Keh; Nzewi Onyekwelu; Kieran McManus; Jim McGuigan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Is there a difference between the management of grade 2b and 3 corrosive gastric injuries?

Authors:  Chittinad Havanond
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  2002-03

Review 3.  Esophageal emergencies: WSES guidelines.

Authors:  Mircea Chirica; Michael D Kelly; Stefano Siboni; Alberto Aiolfi; Carlo Galdino Riva; Emanuele Asti; Davide Ferrari; Ari Leppäniemi; Richard P G Ten Broek; Pierre Yves Brichon; Yoram Kluger; Gustavo Pereira Fraga; Gil Frey; Nelson Adami Andreollo; Federico Coccolini; Cristina Frattini; Ernest E Moore; Osvaldo Chiara; Salomone Di Saverio; Massimo Sartelli; Dieter Weber; Luca Ansaloni; Walter Biffl; Helene Corte; Imtaz Wani; Gianluca Baiocchi; Pierre Cattan; Fausto Catena; Luigi Bonavina
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Perioperative Evaluation of Patient Outcomes after Severe Acid Corrosive Injury.

Authors:  Ming-Ho Wu; Han-Yun Wu
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2015-10-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.