Literature DB >> 27047272

NUTRITIONAL THERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE CORROSIVE INTOXICATION IN ADULTS.

Andon Chibishev1, Velo Markoski2, Ivica Smokovski1, Emilija Shikole3, Aleksandra Stevcevska1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Acute intoxications with corrosive substances can cause severe chemical injuries of the upper gastrointestinal tract, most often located in the mouth, pharynx, esophagus, stomach and duodenum. If a patient survives the acute phase of intoxication, regenerative response may result in esophageal and/or gastric stenosis, and increased risk of esophageal and gastric cancer. Such intoxication may be fatal due to perforation or tracheal necrosis. Enteral nutrition is a nutritional method when nutritional substances are administered through specially designed tubing placed through the nose or percutaneously, directly into the GIT. AIM: The aim of this study is to describe the methods of artificial nutrition in patients with acute corrosive intoxications and the importance of nutritional support in the treatment of these intoxications. DISCUSSION: Nutrition in the treatment of acute corrosive intoxications is one of the most important therapeutic processes that largely contribute to faster recovery of the post-corrosive injuries of upper GIT, stabilization of biologic, immunologic and metabolic parameters, and reduction of length of stay in hospital Aim of the treatment of acute corrosive intoxications is to prevent perforation and progressive fibrosis, and esophageal and gastric stenosis. There are different and often conflicting positions, on the conservative treatment of acute corrosive intoxications in adults. Such treatment mainly consists of anti-secretory treatment, antibiotics and intensive hyper-alimentation, aiming to prevent late post-corrosive intoxications.
CONCLUSION: It is considered that nutritional support plays a major role in maintenance of metabolic processes and prevention of severe metabolic complications that could additionally aggravate the condition and impair the treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  corrosive poisonings; deglutition; deglutition disorders; enteral nutrition; nutritional therapy; parenteral nutrition

Year:  2016        PMID: 27047272      PMCID: PMC4789631          DOI: 10.5455/msm.2016.28.66-70

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mater Sociomed        ISSN: 1512-7680


1. INTRODUCTION

Acute intoxications with corrosive substances can cause severe chemical injuries of the upper gastrointestinal tract, most often located in the mouth, pharynx, esophagus, stomach and duodenum. If a patient survives the acute phase of intoxication, regenerative response may result in esophageal and/or gastric stenosis, and increased risk of esophageal and gastric cancer. Such intoxication may be fatal due to perforation or tracheal necrosis. Unlike pediatric population where corrosive intoxications are most often accidental, corrosive intoxications in adult patients are intentional or suicidal in more than 90% of the cases (1-3). Severity of the resulting chemical injuries depend on several factors: nature of the corrosive substance, quantity, concentration, duration of exposition, swallowing, food presence, gastroesophageal reflux, or various previous pathological conditions of the upper gastrointestinal tract (4). Post-corrosive injuries can be reversible and irreversible. Injured mucosa, submucosa and muscular layer are regenerating poorly due to the surrounding inflammation, necrosis and secondary complications. Resulting fibrosis and adhesions or circular stenosis greatly impair the upper gastrointestinal function such as impaired peristaltic and passage. Latter leads to further deterioration of patient’s general condition, inability for physiologic nutrition, weight loss, prostration and cachexia. Such development can result in fatal outcome due to inadequate nutrition, i.e. inability for normal feeding caused by complications (5). Severe GIT injuries prevent normal nutrition of patients. Patients are in poor general condition, characterized by hypercatabolic state and negative nitrogen balance. Therefore, early nutritional support is of great importance for the treatment and outcome of these patients. Effects of the nutrition substitution in patients with life-threatening disorders, including the reduction of infection risk, aspiration pneumonia or pulmonary embolism, as well as stimulation and facilitated healing of injuries, are main reasons for use of artificial nutritional support in patients with acute corrosive intoxications (6, 7).

2. AIM OF THE STUDY

Aim of this study is to describe the methods of artificial nutrition in patients with acute corrosive intoxications and the importance of nutritional support in the treatment of these intoxications. Therapeutic management of acute corrosive intoxications includes symptomatic treatment and nutritional support. These patients require intensive hyperalimentation in the first 20 days during the healing of post-corrosive stenosis, that can continue for the next 2-4 months if post-corrosive stenosis develops. Such nutritional requirement persists and might impair patient’s well-being, causing difficulties for treating physician until conditions are met for surgical intervention of the stenosis that impairs physiologic nutrition (8, 9). Nutritional support in corrosive intoxications until recently was based on total parenteral nutrition. Due to the resulting complications, expensive nutritional solutions and invasive investigational procedures, enteral nutrition through nasoenteral tubes and enterostoma is the preferred nutritional method in the last 10 years. Parenteral nutrition is administered in 2 ways: a) peripheral vein and b) Central vein. During the administration in peripheral vein, most commonly used are the cubital veins, and the administration should last no longer than 7-10 days (Figure 2). During the application in the central vein, most commonly used are subclavian veins and the administration could last longer than 30 days (10). Patient with severe corrosive intoxication (extensive local injuries) Presentation of veins for administration of nutritional solutions Parenteral application of nutritional solutions is followed by complications that may impair the nutrition of patients and may cause difficulties for the treating physician in the planning and implementation of the nutritional support. Most frequent complications are: complications related to the central or peripheral venous catheter, infections, metabolic complications, disturbance of acid-base balance. As a result of the numerous complications and the associated considerable financial costs, parenteral access of nutritional substances is substituted by the enteral administration due to its simplicity, safety and lower associated costs (11). Enteral nutrition is a nutritional method when nutritional substances are administered through specially designed tubing placed through the nose or percutaneously, directly into the GIT. Contemporary definition of enteral nutrition includes all forms of nutritional support requiring use of nutrition for specific medical aims, as defined in the European legal regulation from 25 March 1999. According to the latest consensually accepted findings, enteral nutrition is a sophisticated nutritional support regimen, practiced and implemented by professional in trained nutritional teams (12). Indications for enteral nutrition are related to all conditions when the ingestion of adequate nutrients with functional GIT, is not possible (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Presentation of potential sites for enteral nutrition

Presentation of potential sites for enteral nutrition Main indications for enteral nutrition are: Poor nutritional status, malnutrition, anorexia, chemical injuries of the upper GIT, short-bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel diseases, prolonged diarrhea, chronic hepatic diseases, encephalopathy, dysphagia of various etiology, CNS tumors, patient receiving chemotherapy, patients with burns, nutritional support in patients in terminal conditions. Absolute contraindications for enteral nutrition, as well as parenteral nutrition, are: shock of any etiology, serum lactates higher than 3-4 mmol/L, hypoxia (PaO2 < 50 mmHg), ethical reasons. Absolute contraindications for enteral nutrition, when parenteral nutrition is not possible, are: intestinal ischemia, acute abdomen, intestinal perforation, acute GIT bleeding, mechanical obstruction (13). Extensive injuries of GIT prevent physiologic nutrition in patients with acute corrosive intoxications. Nutrition provides life-sustaining treatment for such patients, who are at risk of malnutrition (14). Nutrition in the treatment of acute corrosive intoxications is one of the most important therapeutic processes that largely contribute to faster recovery of the post-corrosive injuries of upper GIT, stabilization of biologic, immunologic and metabolic parameters, and reduction of length of stay in hospital (15). The type of artificial nutritional support depends on the endoscopic stage of esophageal or gastric injury (16). Classification of post-corrosive injuries in our patients is based on the 5-stage of Kikendal classification (Table 1) (17).
Table 1

Kikendal classification

Kikendal classification In patients with Stage I according to Kikendal classification, total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is used until urgent esophagogastroduodenoscopy is performed. By taking precise medical history and hetero-anamnesis, information is received if the patient used any other chemical substance or medicine. After consultation with psychiatrist, that is mandatory in our protocol, nutrition is liberalized and the patient is discharged. In patients with Stage II A, total parenteral nutrition is used for the first 24-48 hours, followed by liquid diet until day 10. Same procedure is performed in these patients as in patients with Stage I, including consultation with psychiatrist. Nutrition can be liberalized thereafter (18). In patients with Stage II and III, it is recommended not to take food through mouth, or ‘esophageal rest’ (NPO – Nill per os) (Figures 5, 6). During the ‘rest’, patient is fed enterally with nasogastric or naso-enteral tubing, gastrostoma or jejunostoma, and parenterallythorugh peripheral or central vein (Figure 7, 8) (19). Extensive esophageal and gastric injuries lead to additional injuries due to the food particles penetrating in granulocytes of the esophageal and gastric wall, thus worsening the inflammation. Such processes in the esophageal and gastric wall continue for several days, and precede a bacterial invasion, inflammatory response and development of granulomatous tissue. All above result in special emphasis on the feeding, where the patient will not receive anything through mouth for 10-15 days and will enable the esophageal and gastric mucosa to regenerate faster without additional trauma (20,21).
Figure 6

Patient with gastro-jejuno-stoma

Figure 7

X-ray of gastro-jejuno-stoma

Patient with naso-jejunal tubing for artificial nutrition Patient with naso-jejunal tubing and use of solution for enteral nutrition Patient with gastro-jejuno-stoma X-ray of gastro-jejuno-stoma

3. DISCUSSION

Aim of the treatment of acute corrosive intoxications is to prevent perforation and progressive fibrosis, and esophageal and gastric stenosis. There are different, and often conflicting positions, on the conservative treatment of acute corrosive intoxications in adults. Such treatment mainly consists of anti-secretory treatment, antibiotics and intensive hyper-alimentation, aiming to prevent late post-corrosive intoxications (22, 23). It is considered that nutritional support plays a major role in maintenance of metabolic processes and prevention of severe metabolic complications that could additionally aggravate the condition and impair the treatment. Nutritional support has been one of the most controversial procedures in modern medicine for a very long time. Twenty years ago, Koretz commented on the nutritional support that there are no sufficient evidence-based medical information to conclude on the indications and the need of nutritional support. However, in the past period, position has changed completely, and currently, there is a strong evidence confirming that malnutrition is independent risk factor for higher morbidity, lower quality of life, longer hospital stay, delayed recovery time, higher hospital costs and higher mortality (24). A consensus was reached in 2006 in all areas where clinical nutrition is practiced, respecting the individual specificities and characteristics of the medical areas where the enteral support is applied. Consensus was reached on all specific and disputed issues, stating that inappropriate nutrition in critically ill patients leads to higher morbidity, longer hospital stay, delayed recovery, lower quality of life, higher hospital costs and higher mortality (25). In critically ill patients complications increase 4-fold, and mortality 6-fold if the albumin level is below 35 g/L (26). Artificial nutritional support dates from 1850 year when a gastro-stoma for nutritional support was implanted for the first time in a child with severe esophageal injuries caused by caustic. Actually, discussing the nutrition in acute corrosive intoxications, debates are still ongoing on the most adequate type of artificial support before physiologic feeding per mouth is initiated. DiConstanzo followed the patients who suffered acute corrosive intoxications with serious post-corrosive esophageal and gastric complications. He suggested use of intensive hyper-alimentation in the first 7 days after intoxication and did not recommend feeding through mouth during the treatment, as it might lead to additional worsening of the patient’s condition (27). Some authors consider that patients with Stage II B and III should have ‘esophageal rest’, i.e. are not allowed to have any food by mouth (NPO–nill per os). Patients are fed enterally through special naso-enteral tubing or entero-stoma, or parenterally through peripheral or central vein. Esophageal rest can last up to day 10 after ingestion or, according to some authors, up to day 15, until the first endoscopic follow-up. Other authors recommend introduction of liquids 48 hours after ingestion if the patient can swallow its own saliva (28,29). Our position is that NPO should last 10-12 days after the ingestion, and the patient should be on liquid diet until day 21. Nutritional care is fundamental component of the clinical treatment and care. Optimized quality of life should be the primary aim in patients on any form of nutritional support and care. This could only be achieved by the use of most suitable practice and adaptation of integrated and multi-profession approach towards nutritional support. It will be more successful if the hospital care is part of the development healthcare strategy (30). The still open issue of most optimal nutritional support in acute corrosive intoxications led to different positions on the advantages and disadvantages of parenteral or enteral nutrition. Some authors consider that optimal approach and treatment of critically ill patients is fast and early enteral nutrition over parenteral nutrition with no nutritional support. Enteral nutrition results in reduction of initial morbidity and reduces the length of stay in hospital. Controversy exists whether a pre-pyloric or post-pyloric nutritional support should be deployed. Inserting of nasogastric tubings is easier than inserting of naso-jejunaltubings. Unlike the nasogastric tubings that demonstrate physiologic benefits, post-pyloric nutrition is associated with less frequent discontinuation, more rapid achievement of caloric benefit, and reduction of risk for gastro-esophageal reflux and obstipation. Difference between the two types of nutritional support is minimal and the choice is based on the experience and adoption of the risk and tolerance protocols (31). There are positions that TPN should be initiated immediately after the endoscopic verification of intoxication and should last until day 15, i.e. until the first endoscopic follow-up, when the enteral nutritional support through naso-enteral tubing should be started lasting until day 31, before the oral feeding or other form of enteral nutrition (gastro-stoma or jejuno-stoma) is in place. According to other authors, in patients with Stage IIB and III of post-corrosive injury of upper GIT, a naso-enteral tubing for nutritional support should be placed in the first 24 hours, and first small quantities of liquids should be inserted in the first 48 hours. American Association of Critically Ill Patients adopted an algorithm for the treatment of acute corrosive intoxications, recommending nutrition through naso-enteral tubing, gastro-stoma and/or jejuno-stoma, additional to the other treatment (32-34). Numerous studies from various authors in the treatment of acute corrosive intoxications recommend enteral nutrition through tubings or entero-stomae. Rationale for such approach is based on the reduction of complications, improvement of patient well-being, easier adjustment of the patient in home conditions (home enteral nutrition) and reduction of hospital costs. General recommendation include installment of gastro-stomae or jejuno-stomae that will enable continuous and quality nutrition for a longer period, maintenance of metabolic-electrolyte balance and stable nutritional status (35-38). Despite the fact that nutritional treatment in acute corrosive intoxications has a major role in the treatment, there is a relatively small number of relevant investigations focused on this issue. European Society of Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition (ESPEN) publishes consensus on the use of enteral nutrition, including the indications for the use of enteral nutrition. These conclusions can also be used in the treatment of patients with corrosive intoxications. In the recent years, several investigations were performed in large groups of patients on the use of enteral nutrition through naso-enteral tubings or entero-stomae, more frequently jejuno-stomae, despite parenteral nutrition, in acute corrosive intoxications. Favorable results are reported in the maintenance of body weight in the patients, electrolyte, metabolic and nitrogen balance. Maintenance of these parameters in physiologic limits has a major importance in the treatment of critically ill patients and their stabilization. Improved results are reported related to patient comorbidities, late post-corrosive complications and possibility of home treatment (39, 40).

4. CONCLUSION

Intoxications with corrosive substances are one of the most severe conditions seen in clinical toxicology. They usually occur among young people, during their most productive years of life, and they often end up with a certain degree of invalidity. Acute corrosive intoxications are burden for every healthcare system. Artificial nutritive support allows control of the nutritive status in our patients and it also reduces the duration of stay in the intensive care unit. Andon Chibishev contributed in the thoroughly processing of the topic,the details and results used in the text are extracted from his researches in the domain of the acute corrosive poisonings and the pictures used are authentic, from patients treated by Dr. Chibishev. Velo Markovski gave his contribution in explaining and presentation of the aspects related to the infectious complications in the application of the nutritive support of the acute corrosive poisonings. Ivica Smokovski gave his contribution in the final phase of the development with translating the text from Macedonian to English. Emilija Shikole contributed in explaining and presentation of the pharmacological and biochemical aspects of the nutritive support at acute corrosive poisonings. Aleksandra Stevchevska contributed in the analysis and integration of the data from the literature mentioned in the final version. Authors declare that there are no conflict of interest related to this manuscript.
  30 in total

1.  [Enteral infusion-nutritional correction of homeostasis in patients with postburn cicatricial stenosis of the esophagus and stomach].

Authors:  M M Abakumov; L N Kostiuchenko; N E Kudriashova
Journal:  Vestn Khir Im I I Grek       Date:  1999

2.  [Our attitude in esophageal and gastric post-caustic lesions].

Authors:  V Gâdea; D Petrescu; E Gâdea; A Bosman; G Olaru; M Alexandrescu; A Lazăr
Journal:  Chirurgia (Bucur)       Date:  2000 May-Jun

3.  Evidence supports nutritional support.

Authors:  H Lochs; C Pichard; S P Allison
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 7.324

Review 4.  Caustic ingestion injuries.

Authors:  J W Kikendall
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.806

5.  [Artificial nutrition in the management of lesions caused by caustic ingestion].

Authors:  B Andreoni; R Biffi; P Padalino; A Marini; L Marzona; F Belloli; S Pozzi; M L Farina; G Tiberio
Journal:  Chir Ital       Date:  1994

6.  Surgical management of esophageal strictures after caustic burns: a 30 years of experience.

Authors:  Yong Han; Qing-Shu Cheng; Xiao-Fei Li; Xiao-Ping Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Corrosive ingestion in adults.

Authors:  Kovil Ramasamy; Vivek V Gumaste
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.062

Review 8.  [Corrosive substance ingestions management].

Authors:  Ljiljana Jovancević; Dragan Dankuc
Journal:  Med Pregl       Date:  2008

9.  Ingestion of strong corrosive alkalis: spectrum of injury to upper gastrointestinal tract and natural history.

Authors:  S A Zargar; R Kochhar; B Nagi; S Mehta; S K Mehta
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Is there a difference between the management of grade 2b and 3 corrosive gastric injuries?

Authors:  Chittinad Havanond
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  2002-03
View more
  1 in total

1.  [Complications of upper gastrointestinal foreign body in children and related risk factors].

Authors:  Yue-Sheng Wang; Jing Zhang; Xiao-Qin Li; Zhi-Dan Yu; Fang Zhou
Journal:  Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.