Literature DB >> 12115445

Porous polymer/bioactive glass composites for soft-to-hard tissue interfaces.

Kai Zhang1, Yue Ma, Lorraine F Francis.   

Abstract

Porous composites consisting of a polysulfone (or cellulose acetate) matrix and bioactive glass particles were prepared by phase separation techniques. Microstructures were designed for potential application as an interconnect between artificial cartilage and bone. The effects of polymer type, concentration and molecular weight, as well as bioactive glass size and content, on the microstructures of the composites were studied. The composites have asymmetric structures with dense top layers and porous structures beneath. The microstructural features depend most strongly on the type of polymer, the interaction between the polymer and bioactive glass, and the glass content. The dense top layer could be removed by abrasion to make a structure with large pores (20-150 microm) exposed. Composites were immersed in simulated body fluid at body temperature. The growth of hydroxycarbonate apatite inside and on the composites demonstrates their potential for integration with bone. Composite modulus and break strength increased with increasing glass content due to the change in composition and pore content. Copyright 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12115445     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.10227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  8 in total

Review 1.  Biomaterials approach to expand and direct differentiation of stem cells.

Authors:  Chou Chai; Kam W Leong
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 11.454

2.  High-strength silk protein scaffolds for bone repair.

Authors:  Biman B Mandal; Ariela Grinberg; Eun Seok Gil; Bruce Panilaitis; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Ingrowth of human mesenchymal stem cells into porous silk particle reinforced silk composite scaffolds: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Danielle N Rockwood; Eun Seok Gil; Sang-Hyug Park; Jonathan A Kluge; Warren Grayson; Sarindr Bhumiratana; Rangam Rajkhowa; Xungai Wang; Sung Jun Kim; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 4.  Engineering complex orthopaedic tissues via strategic biomimicry.

Authors:  Dovina Qu; Christopher Z Mosher; Margaret K Boushell; Helen H Lu
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Preparation and characterization of bioactive and biodegradable wollastonite/poly(D,L-lactic acid) composite scaffolds.

Authors:  Haiyan Li; Jiang Chang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 6.  Biomaterials as a Vital Frontier for Stem Cell-Based Tissue Regeneration.

Authors:  Ahmed Nugud; Latifa Alghfeli; Moustafa Elmasry; Ibrahim El-Serafi; Ahmed T El-Serafi
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-03-24

7.  The effect of implantation on scaffoldless three-dimensional engineered bone constructs.

Authors:  Michael J Smietana; Fatima N Syed-Picard; Jinjin Ma; Tatiana Kostrominova; Ellen M Arruda; Lisa M Larkin
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 2.416

8.  Synthesis of scaffold-free, three dimensional, osteogenic constructs following culture of skeletal osteoprogenitor cells on glass surfaces.

Authors:  Latifa Alghfeli; Divyasree Parambath; Shaista Manzoor; Helmtrud I Roach; Richard O C Oreffo; Ahmed T El-Serafi
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2021-10-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.