Literature DB >> 20656075

Ingrowth of human mesenchymal stem cells into porous silk particle reinforced silk composite scaffolds: An in vitro study.

Danielle N Rockwood1, Eun Seok Gil, Sang-Hyug Park, Jonathan A Kluge, Warren Grayson, Sarindr Bhumiratana, Rangam Rajkhowa, Xungai Wang, Sung Jun Kim, Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic, David L Kaplan.   

Abstract

Silk fibroin protein is biodegradable and biocompatible, exhibiting excellent mechanical properties for various biomedical applications. However, porous three-dimensional (3-D) silk fibroin scaffolds, or silk sponges, usually fall short in matching the initial mechanical requirements for bone tissue engineering. In the present study, silk sponge matrices were reinforced with silk microparticles to generate protein-protein composite scaffolds with desirable mechanical properties for in vitro osteogenic tissue formation. It was found that increasing the silk microparticle loading led to a substantial increase in the scaffold compressive modulus from 0.3 MPa (non-reinforced) to 1.9 MPa for 1:2 (matrix:particle) reinforcement loading by dry mass. Biochemical, gene expression, and histological assays were employed to study the possible effects of increasing composite scaffold stiffness, due to microparticle reinforcement, on in vitro osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs). Increasing silk microparticle loading increased the osteogenic capability of hMSCs in the presence of bone morphogenic protein-2 (BMP-2) and other osteogenic factors in static culture for up to 6 weeks. The calcium adsorption increased dramatically with increasing loading, as observed from biochemical assays, histological staining, and microcomputer tomography (μCT) analysis. Specifically, calcium content in the scaffolds increased by 0.57, 0.71, and 1.27 mg (per μg of DNA) from 3 to 6 weeks for matrix to particle dry mass loading ratios of 1:0, 1:1, and 1:2, respectively. In addition, μCT imaging revealed that at 6 weeks, bone volume fraction increased from 0.78% for non-reinforced to 7.1% and 6.7% for 1:1 and 1:2 loading, respectively. Our results support the hypothesis that scaffold stiffness may strongly influence the 3-D in vitro differentiation capabilities of hMSCs, providing a means to improve osteogenic outcomes.
Copyright © 2010 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20656075      PMCID: PMC2967589          DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.07.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  39 in total

1.  Cell differentiation by mechanical stress.

Authors:  Gregory H Altman; Rebecca L Horan; Ivan Martin; Jian Farhadi; Peter R H Stark; Vladimir Volloch; John C Richmond; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic; David L Kaplan
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2001-12-28       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Tissue engineered microsphere-based matrices for bone repair: design and evaluation.

Authors:  Mark Borden; Mohamed Attawia; Yusuf Khan; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Porous polymer/bioactive glass composites for soft-to-hard tissue interfaces.

Authors:  Kai Zhang; Yue Ma; Lorraine F Francis
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2002-09-15

Review 4.  Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate.

Authors:  Dennis E Discher; Paul Janmey; Yu-Li Wang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Tissue engineering of bone: material and matrix considerations.

Authors:  Yusuf Khan; Michael J Yaszemski; Antonios G Mikos; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 6.  Tissue engineering for bone defect healing: an update on a multi-component approach.

Authors:  Inga Drosse; Elias Volkmer; Rodolfo Capanna; Pietro De Biase; Wolf Mutschler; Matthias Schieker
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 7.  Silk-based biomaterials.

Authors:  Gregory H Altman; Frank Diaz; Caroline Jakuba; Tara Calabro; Rebecca L Horan; Jingsong Chen; Helen Lu; John Richmond; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 8.  Tissue engineering: orthopedic applications.

Authors:  C T Laurencin; A M Ambrosio; M D Borden; J A Cooper
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 9.590

9.  Potential of fortified fibrin/hyaluronic acid composite gel as a cell delivery vehicle for chondrocytes.

Authors:  Sang-Hyug Park; Ji Hao Cui; So Ra Park; Byoung-Hyun Min
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.094

10.  Superior in vitro biological response and mechanical properties of an implantable nanostructured biomaterial: Nanohydroxyapatite-silicone rubber composite.

Authors:  W W Thein-Han; J Shah; R D K Misra
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 8.947

View more
  16 in total

1.  Materials fabrication from Bombyx mori silk fibroin.

Authors:  Danielle N Rockwood; Rucsanda C Preda; Tuna Yücel; Xiaoqin Wang; Michael L Lovett; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 2.  Silk scaffolds for musculoskeletal tissue engineering.

Authors:  Danyu Yao; Haifeng Liu; Yubo Fan
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2015-10-06

3.  High-strength silk protein scaffolds for bone repair.

Authors:  Biman B Mandal; Ariela Grinberg; Eun Seok Gil; Bruce Panilaitis; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Bioreactor cultivation of anatomically shaped human bone grafts.

Authors:  Joshua P Temple; Keith Yeager; Sarindr Bhumiratana; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic; Warren L Grayson
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2014

5.  Intervertebral disk tissue engineering using biphasic silk composite scaffolds.

Authors:  Sang-Hyug Park; Eun Seok Gil; Hongsik Cho; Biman B Mandal; Lee W Tien; Byoung-Hyun Min; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 3.845

6.  Development of silk-based scaffolds for tissue engineering of bone from human adipose-derived stem cells.

Authors:  Cristina Correia; Sarindr Bhumiratana; Le-Ping Yan; Ana L Oliveira; Jeffrey M Gimble; Danielle Rockwood; David L Kaplan; Rui A Sousa; Rui L Reis; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 8.947

7.  [Bone tissue engineering. Reconstruction of critical sized segmental bone defects in the ovine tibia].

Authors:  J C Reichert; D R Epari; M E Wullschleger; A Berner; S Saifzadeh; U Nöth; I C Dickinson; M A Schuetz; D W Hutmacher
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 8.  Scaffold design for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Liliana Polo-Corrales; Magda Latorre-Esteves; Jaime E Ramirez-Vick
Journal:  J Nanosci Nanotechnol       Date:  2014-01

9.  Bone scaffold architecture modulates the development of mineralized bone matrix by human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Ivan Marcos-Campos; Darja Marolt; Petros Petridis; Sarindr Bhumiratana; Daniel Schmidt; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Patterned silk film scaffolds for aligned lamellar bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Lee W Tien; Eun Seok Gil; Sang-Hyug Park; Biman B Mandal; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Macromol Biosci       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 4.979

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.