Literature DB >> 12111947

Coupling and decoupling theory and its application to the MRI phased array.

Ray F Lee1, Randy O Giaquinto, Christopher J Hardy.   

Abstract

In classical MRI phased-array design, optimal coil overlapping is used to minimize coupling between nearest-neighbor coils, and low input impedance preamplifiers are used to isolate the relatively weak coupling between non-nearest neighbors. However, to make the complex sensitivities of phased-array coils sufficiently distinct in parallel spatially-encoded MRI, it is desirable to have no overlapping between coils. Also, if phased arrays are used as transmit coils in MRI, one can no longer rely on the low input impedance of the preamplifiers for decoupling. Here a coupling and decoupling theory is introduced to provide a better understanding of the relations between coupled and uncoupled signals in the MRI phased array, and to offer a new method for decoupling phased-array coils without overlapping the nearest coil pairs. The new decoupling method is based on the assumption that any n-element phased array can be decoupled by a 2n-port interface system between phased array and preamplifiers. The detailed analysis and the experimental results show that a four-port interface can be used to decouple a two-element phased array. Furthermore, the four-port interfaces can serve as building blocks to construct a 2n-port decoupling interface. This new method allows one to place the coil elements anywhere that could optimize parallel spatial encoding without concern for coupling between the coils. The method can also be used for phased-array transmit coils. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12111947     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  29 in total

1.  Current CONtrolled Transmit And Receive Coil Elements (CONTAR) for Parallel Acquisition and Parallel Excitation Techniques at High-Field MRI.

Authors:  E Kirilina; A Kühne; T Lindel; W Hoffmann; K H Rhein; T Riemer; F Seifert
Journal:  Appl Magn Reson       Date:  2011-08-21       Impact factor: 0.831

2.  Lumped-element planar strip array (LPSA) for parallel MRI.

Authors:  Ray F Lee; Christopher J Hardy; Daniel K Sodickson; Paul A Bottomley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  A degeneracy study in the circulant and bordered-circulant approach to birdcage and planar coils.

Authors:  Y-C N Cheng; T P Eagan; T Chmielewski; J Flock; M-C Kang; T K Kidane; Sh M Shvartsman; R W Brown
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Active decoupling of RF coils using a transmit array system.

Authors:  Ali Caglar Özen; Michael Bock; Ergin Atalar
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Basic considerations on the impact of the coil array on the performance of Transmit SENSE.

Authors:  U Katscher; J Röhrs; P Börnert
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2005-02-11       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Overcoming high-field RF problems with non-magnetic Cartesian feedback transceivers.

Authors:  D I Hoult; D Foreman; G Kolansky; D Kripiakevich
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 7.  Parallel magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ulrich Katscher; Peter Börnert
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 8.  Massively parallel MRI detector arrays.

Authors:  Boris Keil; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.229

9.  Precompensation for mutual coupling between array elements in parallel excitation.

Authors:  Yong Pang; Xiaoliang Zhang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2011-12

10.  Ultra-low output impedance RF power amplifier for parallel excitation.

Authors:  Xu Chu; Xing Yang; Yunfeng Liu; Juan Sabate; Yudong Zhu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.