Literature DB >> 12110421

The influence of microcomputed tomography threshold variations on the assessment of structural and mechanical trabecular bone properties.

T Hara1, E Tanck, J Homminga, R Huiskes.   

Abstract

In this study, we investigate how morphological parameters and mechanical properties derived from microcomputed tomography (microCT) are affected by small errors in threshold value when variable bone structures and different bone volume fractions are involved. For this purpose, biopsies of vertebrae of 6-, 23-, and 230-week-old female pigs were scanned using microCT. For each specimen, five threshold values were determined within the range of thresholds that an observer could select realistically, in steps of 0.5%. The scans were converted to microfinite-element (microFE) models, used to determine the elastic moduli. A variation of 0.5% in threshold resulted in a 5% difference in bone volume fraction and 9% difference in maximal stiffness for bone cubes with a volume fraction of <0.15. When the volume fraction was >0.2, these differences were only 2% and 3%, respectively. For all bone cubes, the differences for trabecular thickness and bone surface density were <3%. The effects on morphological anisotropy and trabecular number were negligible for threshold variations of 0.5%. These findings suggest that threshold selection is important for the accurate determination of volume fraction and mechanical properties, especially for low bone volume fractions; the architectural directionality is less sensitive to changes in threshold.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12110421     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(02)00782-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  26 in total

1.  Adjuvant arthritis-induced changes on ampicillin binding in serum and tissues under the influence of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in rats.

Authors:  E Tigka; I Daskala; G Rallis; S Anagnostopoulou; C Tesseromatis
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.441

2.  Study of subchondral bone adaptations in a rodent surgical model of OA using in vivo micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  D D McErlain; C T G Appleton; R B Litchfield; V Pitelka; J L Henry; S M Bernier; F Beier; D W Holdsworth
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 6.576

3.  The trabecular architecture of the superior articular process of the lumbar spine (L2-S1).

Authors:  Susanne Drews; Maiko Matsuura; Reinhard Putz
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 4.  Quantifying the 3D macrostructure of tissue scaffolds.

Authors:  Julian R Jones; Robert C Atwood; Gowsihan Poologasundarampillai; Sheng Yue; Peter D Lee
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Quantitative analysis of bone and soft tissue by micro-computed tomography: applications to ex vivo and in vivo studies.

Authors:  Graeme M Campbell; Antonia Sophocleous
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2014-08-20

6.  Deciphering an extreme morphology: bone microarchitecture of the hero shrew backbone (Soricidae: Scutisorex).

Authors:  Stephanie M Smith; Kenneth D Angielczyk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  MicroCT morphometry analysis of mouse cancellous bone: intra- and inter-system reproducibility.

Authors:  K Verdelis; L Lukashova; E Atti; P Mayer-Kuckuk; M G E Peterson; S Tetradis; A L Boskey; M C H van der Meulen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, peripheral quantitative computed tomography, and micro-computed tomography techniques are discordant for bone density and geometry measurements in the guinea pig.

Authors:  Ivy L Mak; Jason R DeGuire; Paula Lavery; Sherry Agellon; Hope A Weiler
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Specimen size and porosity can introduce error into microCT-based tissue mineral density measurements.

Authors:  Roberto J Fajardo; Esther Cory; Nipun D Patel; Ara Nazarian; Andres Laib; Rajaram K Manoharan; James E Schmitz; Jeremy M DeSilva; Laura M MacLatchy; Brian D Snyder; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Effects of loading orientation on the morphology of the predicted yielded regions in trabecular bone.

Authors:  Xiutao Shi; Xiang Wang; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.