Literature DB >> 12109757

List composition and the word-frequency effect for recognition memory.

Kenneth J Malmberg1, Kevin Murnane.   

Abstract

The attention/likelihood theory (ALT; M. Glanzer & J. K. Adams, 1990) and the retrieving effectively from memory (REM) theory (R. M. Shiffrin & M. Steyvers, 1997) make different predictions concerning the effect of list composition on word recognition. The predictions were empirically tested for two-alternative forced-choice, yes-no, and ratings recognition tasks. In the current article, the authors found that discrimination of low-frequency words increased as the proportion of high-frequency words studied increased. The results disconfirm the ALT prediction that recognition is insensitive to list composition, and they disconfirm the predictions of the REM model described by R. M. Shiffrin and M. Steyvers (1997). The current authors discuss a slightly modified version of REM that can better predict our findings, and we discuss the challenges the present findings pose for ALT and REM.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12109757     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.28.4.616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  13 in total

1.  The mirror effect and the spacing effect.

Authors:  Bennet Murdock
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

2.  Feature frequency effects in recognition memory.

Authors:  Kenneth J Malmberg; Mark Steyvers; Joseph D Stephens; Richard M Shiffrin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-06

3.  The word frequency effect for recognition memory and the elevated-attention hypothesis.

Authors:  Kenneth J Malmberg; Thomas O Nelson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-01

4.  The effects of word frequency and similarity on recognition judgments: the role of recollection.

Authors:  Heekyeong Park; Lynne M Reder; Daniel Dickison
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Effects of word frequency on individual-item and serial order retention: tests of the order-encoding view.

Authors:  Paul S Merritt; Edward L DeLosh; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-12

6.  Modeling the effects of verbal and nonverbal pair strength on associative recognition.

Authors:  Jing Xu; Kenneth J Malmberg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-04

7.  Discriminating between changes in bias and changes in accuracy for recognition memory of emotional stimuli.

Authors:  Rebecca C Grider; Kenneth J Malmberg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-07

Review 8.  Three regularities of recognition memory: the role of bias.

Authors:  Andrew Hilford; Laurence T Maloney; Murray Glanzer; Kisok Kim
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

9.  Item strength affects working memory capacity.

Authors:  Zhangfan Shen; Vencislav Popov; Anita B Delahay; Lynne M Reder
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-02

10.  The low-frequency encoding disadvantage: Word frequency affects processing demands.

Authors:  Rachel A Diana; Lynne M Reder
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.