Literature DB >> 12107595

The compositional evolution of the murid genome.

Nick G C Smith1, Adam Eyre-Walker.   

Abstract

Murid rodents show much less variation in isochore base composition than do most other mammals, a difference which has been referred to as the murid shift. We have investigated the murid shift by asking (1) whether the murid shift is ongoing and (2) whether there is any evidence of selection or biased gene conversion affecting base composition in the present-day mouse genome. By estimating the ancestral base composition of protein-coding genes in murids we can confirm that the murid shift is ongoing. Tests using nongenic polymorphism data fail to reject the hypothesis that base composition is due to mutation bias alone. However, the patterns of compositional change suggested by the polymorphism and divergence data differ, suggesting the possibility of two murid shifts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12107595     DOI: 10.1007/s00239-002-2316-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  13 in total

1.  DNA helix: the importance of being GC-rich.

Authors:  Alexander E Vinogradov
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  There is no universal molecular clock for invertebrates, but rate variation does not scale with body size.

Authors:  Jessica A Thomas; John J Welch; Megan Woolfit; Lindell Bromham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The GC content of primates and rodents genomes is not at equilibrium: a reply to Antezana.

Authors:  Laurent Duret
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Genome size and metabolic intensity in tetrapods: a tale of two lines.

Authors:  Alexander E Vinogradov; Olga V Anatskaya
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Mutation exposed: a neutral explanation for extreme base composition of an endosymbiont genome.

Authors:  Jennifer J Wernegreen; Daniel J Funk
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Isochores and tissue-specificity.

Authors:  Alexander E Vinogradov
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Genomewide spatial correspondence between nonsynonymous divergence and neutral polymorphism reveals extensive adaptation in Drosophila.

Authors:  J Michael Macpherson; Guy Sella; Jerel C Davis; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Strong regional heterogeneity in base composition evolution on the Drosophila X chromosome.

Authors:  Wen-Ya Ko; Shengfu Piao; Hiroshi Akashi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Substitution patterns are under different influences in primates and rodents.

Authors:  Yves Clément; Peter F Arndt
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  Design factors that influence PCR amplification success of cross-species primers among 1147 mammalian primer pairs.

Authors:  Donna J E Housley; Zachary A Zalewski; Stephanie E Beckett; Patrick J Venta
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2006-10-09       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.