Literature DB >> 12093851

Day 3 embryo transfer with combined evaluation at the pronuclear and cleavage stages compares favourably with day 5 blastocyst transfer.

Laura Rienzi1, Filippo Ubaldi, Marcello Iacobelli, Susanna Ferrero, Maria Giulia Minasi, Francisco Martinez, Jan Tesarik, Ermanno Greco.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The respective advantages of day 3 and day 5 embryo transfer are a matter of debate. Previous comparisons did not include pronuclear stage zygote scoring and cumulative success rates (fresh and cryopreserved embryos).
METHODS: Patients were randomized prospectively for day 3 or day 5 embryo transfer. Day 3 embryos were selected for transfer and cryopreservation by using combined evaluation at the pronuclear and cleavage stages.
RESULTS: There was no difference between day 3 and day 5 fresh embryo transfers as to the rates of pregnancy (58 versus 62%), clinical pregnancy (56 versus 58%), delivery (50 versus 48%), implantation (35 versus 38%) and birth (33 versus 36%) rates. The corresponding values for cryopreserved embryo transfers were also similar. However, day 3 embryo transfer compared favourably with day 5 transfer when the pregnancy (90 versus 66%), clinical pregnancy (85 versus 62%) and delivery (77 versus 52%) rates were calculated per oocyte recovery attempt.
CONCLUSIONS: With a selected population of good prognosis patients and our embryo selection criteria, the implantation potential of day 3 and day 5 embryos is equal. Per oocyte recovery attempt, day 3 transfer is more clinically efficient than day 5 transfer, but at least one transfer of cryopreserved embryos is necessary to manifest this superiority.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12093851     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/17.7.1852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  27 in total

1.  Comparison of pregnancy, implantation, and multiple gestation rates for day 3 versus day 5 embryo transfers.

Authors:  Stephanie J Estes; Linda M Hoover; Scott E Smith; Stephen G Somkuti; Jay S Schinfeld; Larry I Barmat
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Selection of embryos for day-3 transfer at the pronuclear-stage and pronuclear-stage cryopreservation results in high delivery rates in fresh and frozen cycles.

Authors:  Diane G Hammitt; Christopher A Sattler; Misty L Manes; Anita P Singh
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Relationship between meiotic spindle characteristics in human oocytes and the timing of the first zygotic cleavage after intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Tomari; Kou Honjou; Yumi Nagata; Toshitaka Horiuchi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Hydroxypropyl cellulose supplementation in vitrification solutions: a prospective study with donor oocytes.

Authors:  Miguel Gallardo; María Hebles; Beatriz Migueles; Mónica Dorado; Laura Aguilera; Mercedes González; Paloma Piqueras; Alejandro Lucas; Lorena Montero; Pascual Sánchez-Martín; Fernando Sánchez-Martín; Ramón Risco
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Ongoing and cumulative pregnancy rate after cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer using vitrification for cryopreservation: impact of age on the results.

Authors:  S Fernández-Shaw; R Cercas; C Braña; C Villas; I Pons
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Supernumerary blastocyst cryopreservation: a key prognostic indicator for patients opting for an elective single blastocyst transfer (eSBT).

Authors:  Christine Mullin; Alan S Berkeley; Jamie A Grifo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate achieved with oocyte vitrification and cleavage stage transfer without embryo selection in a standard infertility program.

Authors:  Filippo Ubaldi; Reno Anniballo; Stefania Romano; Elena Baroni; Laura Albricci; Silvia Colamaria; Antonio Capalbo; Fabio Sapienza; Gábor Vajta; Laura Rienzi
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Building a model to increase live birth rate through patient-specific optimization of embryo transfer day.

Authors:  R H Goldman; D J Kaser; S A Missmer; S S Srouji; L V Farland; C Racowsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Embryo development of fresh 'versus' vitrified metaphase II oocytes after ICSI: a prospective randomized sibling-oocyte study.

Authors:  Laura Rienzi; Stefania Romano; Laura Albricci; Roberta Maggiulli; Antonio Capalbo; Elena Baroni; Silvia Colamaria; Fabio Sapienza; Filippo Ubaldi
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 10.  Factors affecting the outcome of human blastocyst vitrification.

Authors:  Amr A Kader; Audrey Choi; Yasser Orief; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.