Literature DB >> 12084311

Which patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder or prostatic urethra are candidates for an orthotopic neobladder?

R E Hautmann1.   

Abstract

Bladder replacement has become a standard method of urinary diversion in adults undergoing cystectomy. When faced with a treatment decision, the patient and urologist are most comfortable if information is available on short- and long-term possible outcomes of the proposed intervention and on the magnitude of the expected effect. This article presents and discusses absolute and relative contraindications for orthotopic neobladders that may help optimize the clinical results with these procedures. As our own series has progressed, so has our philosophy regarding patients who are candidates for an orthotopic reconstruction. All men who require radical cystectomy as treatment for bladder cancer are initially thought to be appropriate candidates for orthotopic lower urinary tract reconstruction. Given the criteria presented in this article approximately, 80% of men are considered acceptable candidates for a neobladder. By these criteria, 65% of women are adequate candidates for an orthotopic bladder.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 12084311     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-000-0016-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   2.862


  24 in total

1.  Lower urinary tract substitution after radical cystectomy with urethral mucosa and submucosa removal in females with trigonal and/or bladder neck involvement.

Authors:  E Bercovich; F Pirozzi; A Curreli
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1998-12

Review 2.  Risk of urethral, vaginal and cervical involvement in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: results of a contemporary cystectomy series from M. D. Anderson Cancer Center.

Authors:  M E Chen; L L Pisters; A Malpica; C A Pettaway; C P Dinney
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Continent urinary diversion.

Authors:  M C Benson; C A Olsson
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.241

4.  Urethral recurrence in patients with orthotopic ileal neobladders.

Authors:  J A Freeman; T A Tarter; D Esrig; J P Stein; D A Elmajian; S C Chen; S Groshen; G Lieskovsky; D G Skinner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Quality of life in patients having an ileal conduit, continent reservoir or orthotopic neobladder after cystectomy for bladder carcinoma.

Authors:  H Kitamura; N Miyao; M Yanase; N Masumori; M Matsukawa; A Takahashi; N Itoh; T Tsukamoto
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.369

6.  Chloride absorption in patients with a continent ileocaecal reservoir (Mainz pouch I).

Authors:  D Filipas; M Fisch; H Abol Enein; J Fichtner; A Bockisch; R Hohenfellner
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1997-04

7.  Bile acid malabsorption after continent urinary diversion with an ileal reservoir.

Authors:  G Olofsson; M Fjälling; A Kilander; K A Ung; O Jonsson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  The risk of urethral tumors in female bladder cancer: can the urethra be used for orthotopic reconstruction of the lower urinary tract?

Authors:  A Stenzl; H Draxl; B Posch; K Colleselli; M Falk; G Bartsch
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Can preoperative psychological defensive strategies, mood and type of lower urinary tract reconstruction predict psychosocial adjustment after cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer?

Authors:  A Månsson; P Christensson; G Johnson; S Colleen
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1998-09

10.  Long-term experience with orthotopic reconstruction of the lower urinary tract in women.

Authors:  H Shimogaki; H Okada; M Fujisawa; S Arakawa; G Kawabata; S Kamidono; N Yamanaka
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  5 in total

1.  [Radical cystectomy in the treatment of bladder cancer always in due time?].

Authors:  M May; K-P Braun; W Richter; C Helke; H Vogler; B Hoschke; M Siegsmund
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Determining when to recommend continent urinary diversion.

Authors:  Scott M Gilbert; James E Montie
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Long-term results of standard procedures in urology: the ileal neobladder.

Authors:  Richard E Hautmann; Bjoern G Volkmer; Martin C Schumacher; Juergen E Gschwend; Urs E Studer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-07-08       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Evaluation of gel spun silk-based biomaterials in a murine model of bladder augmentation.

Authors:  Joshua R Mauney; Glenn M Cannon; Michael L Lovett; Edward M Gong; Dolores Di Vizio; Pablo Gomez; David L Kaplan; Rosalyn M Adam; Carlos R Estrada
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Patient and disease-specific factors and their influence on urinary reconstruction choice at a referral center.

Authors:  Adam M Luchey; Gautum Agarwal; Patrick N Espiritu; Jorge L Lockhart; Julio M Pow-Sang; Philippe E Spiess; Wade J Sexton; Michael A Poch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 4.226

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.