Literature DB >> 16830152

Long-term results of standard procedures in urology: the ileal neobladder.

Richard E Hautmann1, Bjoern G Volkmer, Martin C Schumacher, Juergen E Gschwend, Urs E Studer.   

Abstract

Over the past 20 years orthotopic urinary reconstruction with the techniques developed at Ulm and Bern has become a widely accepted form of urinary diversion. So far, both centers together have performed more than 1,300 orthotopic bladder substitutions with an overall rate of neobladder formation in 58% of all cystectomized patients. Today, the absolute contraindications for this procedure are urinary stress incontinence, damaged rhabdosphincter, severely impaired renal and liver function, severe intestinal diseases or an oncologic situation requiring urethrectomy. In patients treated for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder, the rate of urethral recurrence in both centers was 1.5 and 5%, respectively, and the rate of upper urinary tract recurrence was 2-3%. Local tumor recurrence usually did not affect neobladder function. The rate of outlet obstruction by local recurrence was 2%, that of gross hematuria 1%, and of entero-reservoir fistulas 1-2%. Daytime continence at 12 months was 92%, while nighttime continence was lower around 80%. Transient or permanent urinary retention was seen in 11-12% of male patients. In both series, long-term upper urinary tract safety was good. The risk of stenoses of the uretero-intestinal anastomosis with consecutive loss of renal function decreased with the introduction of non-refluxing implantation techniques. The rate of long-term metabolic complications remains low when adequate substitution with sodium bicarbonate is guaranteed in patients with impaired renal function. Patient selection and meticulous postoperative follow-up contributed to achieve good long-term results after cystectomy and orthotopic ileal neobladder substitution of the two large series of patients from the Universities of Ulm and Bern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16830152     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-006-0105-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  57 in total

Review 1.  Managing patients after an ileal orthotopic bladder substitution.

Authors:  C Varol; U E Studer
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Orthotopic ileal neobladder reconstruction in patients with bladder cancer following renal transplantation.

Authors:  Herve Lang; Robert de Petriconi; Ulrich Wenderoth; Bjoern G Volkmer; Richard E Hautmann; Juergen E Gschwend
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  A newer form of bladder substitute based on historical perspectives.

Authors:  U E Studer; D Ackermann; G A Casanova; E J Zingg
Journal:  Semin Urol       Date:  1988-02

4.  [Antireflux uretero-ileal implantation via a mucosal sulcus].

Authors:  A Le Duc; M Camey; P Teillac
Journal:  Ann Urol (Paris)       Date:  1987

5.  [Clinical study of radical cystectomy and urinary reconstruction in elderly patients with bladder cancer].

Authors:  T Saika; D Manabe; B Suyama
Journal:  Hinyokika Kiyo       Date:  1999-01

Review 6.  Metabolic consequences of continent urinary diversion.

Authors:  R D Mills; U E Studer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Urethral recurrence in patients with orthotopic ileal neobladders.

Authors:  J A Freeman; T A Tarter; D Esrig; J P Stein; D A Elmajian; S C Chen; S Groshen; G Lieskovsky; D G Skinner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Orthotopic ileal neobladder in females: impact of the urethral resection line on functional results.

Authors:  R E Hautmann; R de Petriconi; K Kleinschmidt; H W Gottfried; J E Gschwend
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2000

9.  Hautmann and Studer orthotopic neobladders: a contemporary experience.

Authors:  Kyung Seop Lee; James E Montie; Rodney L Dunn; Cheryl T Lee
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Rationale and technique of nerve sparing radical cystectomy before an orthotopic neobladder procedure in women.

Authors:  A Stenzl; K Colleselli; S Poisel; H Feichtinger; H Pontasch; G Bartsch
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  58 in total

Review 1.  Complications associated with urinary diversion.

Authors:  Richard E Hautmann; Stefan H Hautmann; Oliver Hautmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  [Management of urinary incontinence after orthotopic urinary diversion].

Authors:  A Soave; R Dahlem; M Rink; S Ahyai; M Fisch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  [Uretero-intestinal anastomosis: Achilles heel of urinary diversion using bowel segments].

Authors:  K Weingärtner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  [100 years German urology". Urinary diversion 2006].

Authors:  R E Hautmann; A Stenzl; U Studer; J W Thüroff
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Staged based directed surveillance of invasive bladder cancer following radical cystectomy: valuable and effective?

Authors:  S Machele Donat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  [Perspectives in urinary diversion].

Authors:  M Hohenfellner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Neobladder formation after pelvic irradiation.

Authors:  Richard E Hautmann; Robert de Petriconi; Bjoern G Volkmer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Which urinary diversion is best after radical cystectomy? The case for "incontinent" diversion.

Authors:  Michael J Leveridge; Michael A S Jewett
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Determining when to recommend continent urinary diversion.

Authors:  Scott M Gilbert; James E Montie
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  [Complications and their management after urinary diversion].

Authors:  S Rogenhofer; S C Müller; T Kälble
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.