Literature DB >> 25774005

Patient and disease-specific factors and their influence on urinary reconstruction choice at a referral center.

Adam M Luchey1, Gautum Agarwal2, Patrick N Espiritu2, Jorge L Lockhart2, Julio M Pow-Sang2, Philippe E Spiess2, Wade J Sexton2, Michael A Poch2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate potential socioeconomic and demographic factors that may influence or be associated with various types of urinary reconstruction (UR) following a radical cystectomy (RC) accounting for existing clinical variables.
METHODS: There were 828 patients that underwent a RC and UR between 2000 and 2013. After excluding patients that did not meet medical or surgical criteria for a continent urinary reconstruction (CUR-orthotopic neobladder or continent catheterizable pouch), there were 714 patients available for analysis. Socioeconomic and demographic data along with disease-specific variables were recorded preoperatively and analyzed to determine a correlation with a particular type of UR.
RESULTS: Non-continent urinary reconstruction (ileal conduit or cutaneous ureterostomies) and CUR accounted for 78.3 % (559/714) and 21.7 % (155/714) of UR following RC, respectively. On univariate analysis, younger age, marital status, employment status, type of insurance, ASA score, and preoperative glomerular filtration rate were significantly associated with CUR (p < 0.01). Travel distance, race, and education level were not factors for UR type. Additionally, there was no significant difference between males and females receiving a CUR. On multivariate analysis, older age [odds ratio (OR) 0.85, p < 0.01], marital status (OR 0.28, p < 0.01), insurance status (OR 0.22, p = 0.04), and higher ASA score (OR 0.50, p < 0.01) remained independent predictors of those less likely to receive a CUR.
CONCLUSION: Predictable socioeconomic and demographic influences exist between the choice of UR after RC. Increasing age corresponds to a decreasing likelihood of receiving a CUR. No significant difference was seen between men and women in undergoing a CUR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cystectomy; Demographics; Socioeconomic status; Urinary bladder neoplasms; Urinary diversion

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25774005     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-015-1532-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  14 in total

1.  Continent urinary reconstruction versus ileal conduit: a contemporary single-institution comparison of perioperative morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  D J Parekh; W B Gilbert; M O Koch; J A Smith
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Body image and bladder cancer specific quality of life in patients with ileal conduit and neobladder urinary diversions.

Authors:  Ryan C Hedgepeth; Scott M Gilbert; Chang He; Cheryl T Lee; David P Wood
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Choosing the right urinary diversion: patient's choice or surgeon's inclination?

Authors:  Eila C Skinner
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 4.  Quality of life after cystectomy and urinary diversion: an evidence based analysis.

Authors:  Elmar W Gerharz; Asa Månsson; Sonja Hunt; Eila C Skinner; Wiking Månsson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Population-based trends in urinary diversion among patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Simon P Kim; Nilay D Shah; Christopher J Weight; R Houston Thompson; Jeffrey K Wang; R Jeffrey Karnes; Leona C Han; Jeanette Y Ziegenfuss; Igor Frank; Matthew K Tollefson; Stephen A Boorjian
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Factors influencing the choice of urinary diversion in patients undergoing radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Matt S Ashley; Siamak Daneshmand
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 7.  Urinary diversion: ileal conduit to neobladder.

Authors:  Richard E Hautmann
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Evidence from the 'PROspective MulticEnTer RadIcal Cystectomy Series 2011 (PROMETRICS 2011)' study: how are preoperative patient characteristics associated with urinary diversion type after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer?

Authors:  Marianne Schmid; Michael Rink; Miriam Traumann; Patrick J Bastian; Georg Bartsch; Jörg Ellinger; Marc-Oliver Grimm; Boris Hadaschik; Axel Haferkamp; Oliver W Hakenberg; Atiqullah Aziz; Florian Hartmann; Edwin Herrmann; Markus Hohenfellner; Günter Janetschek; Michael Gierth; Sasc ha Pahernik; Chris Protzel; Jan Roigas; Murat Gördük; Lukas Lusuardi; Matthias May; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Margit Fisch; Felix K H Chun
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate.

Authors:  Andrew S Levey; Lesley A Stevens; Christopher H Schmid; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Alejandro F Castro; Harold I Feldman; John W Kusek; Paul Eggers; Frederick Van Lente; Tom Greene; Josef Coresh
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 10.  Which patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder or prostatic urethra are candidates for an orthotopic neobladder?

Authors:  R E Hautmann
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.862

View more
  1 in total

1.  Socioeconomic status is associated with urinary diversion utilization after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Matthew J Maurice; Simon P Kim; Robert Abouassaly
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 2.370

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.