Literature DB >> 12084286

Should laparoscopy be the standard approach used for radical nephrectomy?

A J Portis1, R V Clayman.   

Abstract

Since its inception in June 1990, laparoscopic radical/total nephrectomy for renal tumor has been successfully applied worldwide to hundreds of patients. Recent 5-year follow-up data have shown this procedure to produce cancer control identical to that of open radical/total nephrectomy. Although in most centers the cost of the procedure remains higher than open surgery, the patient benefits of decreased pain, reduced hospitalization, less blood loss, and more rapid convalescence appear to be universal. At this time, we believe that laparoscopic radical/total nephrectomy for the treatment of renal tumors should become the new standard of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 12084286     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-001-0014-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   2.862


  29 in total

1.  Cytokine levels after open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J M Bellón; L Manzano; L Bernardos; N Ga-Honduvilla; A Larrad; J Buján; M Alvarez-Mon
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.745

2.  Lymphocytic subpopulation changes after open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective and comparative study on 38 patients.

Authors:  M Cristaldi; M Rovati; M Elli; S Gerlinzani; A Lesma; L Balzarotti; A M Taschieri
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1997-06

3.  The surgical management of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  D G Skinner; C D Vermillion; R B Colvin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Organ entrapment and renal morcellation: permeability studies.

Authors:  D A Urban; K Kerbl; E M McDougall; A M Stone; P T Fadden; R V Clayman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  The long-term outcome of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for small renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Y Ono; T Kinukawa; R Hattori; M Gotoh; O Kamihira; S Ohshima
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: the Cleveland clinic experience.

Authors:  I S Gill; D Schweizer; M G Hobart; G T Sung; E A Klein; A C Novick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Why is urological laparoscopy minimally invasive?

Authors:  P Fornara; C Doehn; M Seyfarth; D Jocham
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Length of stay has minimal impact on the cost of hospital admission.

Authors:  P A Taheri; D A Butz; L J Greenfield
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal tumor: the Washington University experience.

Authors:  E McDougall; R V Clayman; O M Elashry
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Adrenal involvement from renal cell carcinoma: predictive value of computerized tomography.

Authors:  I S Gill; B L McClennan; K Kerbl; J M Carbone; M Wick; R V Clayman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comprehensive assessment of quality of life and psychosocial adjustment in patients with renal tumors undergoing open, laparoscopic and nephron sparing surgery.

Authors:  Patricia A Parker; Richard Swartz; Bryan Fellman; Diana Urbauer; Yisheng Li; Louis L Pisters; Charles J Rosser; Christopher G Wood; Surena F Matin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Hand-assisted and total laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison.

Authors:  Jonathan Silberstein; J Kellogg Parsons
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.