Literature DB >> 9194291

Lymphocytic subpopulation changes after open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective and comparative study on 38 patients.

M Cristaldi1, M Rovati, M Elli, S Gerlinzani, A Lesma, L Balzarotti, A M Taschieri.   

Abstract

Up to now it has been unclear whether laparoscopic surgery has fewer immunosuppressive effects than traditional laparotomic procedures. In a series of 38 patients affected by symptomatic gallstone disease and operated on either by laparoscopy (group 1) or by traditional open surgery (group 2), we determined the postoperative changes in lymphocyte subpopulations up to postoperative day (POD) 30. We collected 15 ml of venous blood from all patients in both groups on the day before surgery and on POD 1, 7, 15, and 30. A control group (group 3) comprised 56 healthy volunteers; the control group was used only to ensure that baseline values were totally comparable with a normal population; only one blood sample was obtained from the subjects in group 3. Patients undergoing open cholecystectomy had a significant decrease in total lymphocyte count on POD 1. Basal levels of lymphocyte subpopulations did not differ significantly in the study and control groups. No differences were found in the preoperative lymphocyte cell counts in the two groups who underwent cholecystectomy. Pan-T cells (CD3) showed a statistically significant marked reduction throughout the observation period. The counts of helper (CD4), suppressor (CD8), and natural killer NK (CD16) T cells were reduced on POD 1; the NK cell (CD16) count remained low until POD 30, B lymphocytes showed no postoperative reduction. In patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a significant postoperative decrease in total lymphocyte count, and in CD3, CD4, and CD8 subpopulations was observed on day 1 only. There was no reduction in CD16 and CD19 subpopulations. A comparative statistical analysis of lymphocyte subpopulations in the two groups was carried out: In the open cholecystectomy group, compared with the laparoscopy group, CD3, CD4, CD8, and CD16 lymphocyte subpopulations showed marked reductions at different time points. In particular, statistically significant differences were found in CD3 levels from POD 1 through POD 30, in CD4 from day 1 through day 7, and in CD8 and CD16 only on day 1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9194291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc        ISSN: 1051-7200


  13 in total

1.  Restricted intravenous fluid regimen reduces the rate of postoperative complications and alters immunological activity of elderly patients operated for abdominal cancer: a randomized prospective clinical trail.

Authors:  Tao Gao; Ning Li; Juan-juan Zhang; Feng-chan Xi; Qi-yi Chen; Wei-ming Zhu; Wen-kui Yu; Jie-shou Li
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Sex-, stress-, and sympathetic post-ganglionic-dependent changes in identity and proportions of immune cells in the dura.

Authors:  Lisa A McIlvried; J Agustin Cruz; Lisa A Borghesi; Michael S Gold
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 6.292

3.  Prognostic value of perioperative leukocyte count in resectable gastric cancer.

Authors:  Xiao-Feng Chen; Jing Qian; Dong Pei; Chen Zhou; Oluf Dimitri Røe; Fang Zhu; Shao-Hua He; Ying-Ying Qian; Yue Zhou; Jun Xu; Jin Xu; Xiao Li; Guo-Qiang Ping; Yi-Qian Liu; Ping Wang; Ren-Hua Guo; Yong-Qian Shu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Perioperative host-tumor inflammatory interactions: a potential trigger for disease recurrence following a curative resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Chikao Miki; Kouji Tanaka; Yasuhiro Inoue; Toshimitsu Araki; Masaki Ohi; Yasuhiko Mohri; Keiichi Uchida; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Differences in stress response between patients undergoing transurethral resection versus endoscopic laser ablation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Goran Bedalov; Zeljko Bartolin; Damir Puskar; Ivan Savić; Ivana Bedalov; Marija Rudolf; Drago Batinić
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2007-04-28       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 6.  Regulating surgical oncotaxis to improve the outcomes in cancer patients.

Authors:  Toshihiro Hirai; Hideo Matsumoto; Hisako Kubota; Yoshiyuki Yamaguchi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Immunologic postoperative competence after laparoscopy versus laparotomy.

Authors:  G Bolla; G Tuzzato
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Evaluation of lymphocytes CD4+ and CD8+ and expression of ZAP-70 kinase on CD3+ and CD19+ lymphocytes in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Kamil Torres; Anna Torres; Andrzej Chrościcki; Ryszard Maciejewski; Sebastian Radej; Jacek Roliński; Łukasz Pietrzyk; Grzegorz Wallner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Should laparoscopy be the standard approach used for radical nephrectomy?

Authors:  A J Portis; R V Clayman
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.862

10.  Immune responses following stereotactic body radiotherapy for stage I primary lung cancer.

Authors:  Yoshiyasu Maehata; Hiroshi Onishi; Kengo Kuriyama; Shinichi Aoki; Masayuki Araya; Ryo Saito; Licht Tominaga; Mitsuhiko Oguri; Tsutomu Araki
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.