Literature DB >> 12084229

Predictors of success in microsurgical correction of vasal and epididymal obstruction.

A M Belker1.   

Abstract

Patients who inquire about microsurgical correction of vasal and epididymal obstructions should be informed about the postoperative rates of both return of sperm to the semen and pregnancy. They also should be informed about the possibility of a successful outcome, depending on their individual circumstances. The various preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors that influence success rates are discussed in this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 12084229     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-001-0037-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   2.862


  27 in total

1.  Vasoepididymostomy for vasectomy reversal: a critical assessment in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  P N Kolettis; A J Thomas
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Antisperm antibodies and fertility after vasovasostomy: a follow-up study of 216 men.

Authors:  H Meinertz; L Linnet; P Fogh-Andersen; T Hjort
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  The incidence and influence upon fertility of antisperm antibodies in seminal fluid following vasectomy reversal.

Authors:  P L Matson; S M Junk; J R Masters; J P Pryor; J L Yovich
Journal:  Int J Androl       Date:  1989-04

4.  A 20-year experience with vasovasostomy.

Authors:  H Y Lee
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Delayed appearance of sperm after end-to-side vasoepididymostomy.

Authors:  J P Jarow; M Sigman; J P Buch; R D Oates
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  The post-vasectomy length of the testicular vasal remnant: a predictor of surgical outcome in microscopic vasectomy reversal.

Authors:  M A Witt; S Heron; L I Lipshultz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Clinical immunology of vasectomy and vasovasostomy.

Authors:  L Linnet
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Should vasectomy reversal be performed in men with older female partners?

Authors:  A J Deck; R E Berger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Association between failure to impregnate after vasovasostomy and sperm agglutinins in semen.

Authors:  L Linnet; T Hjort; P Fogh-Andersen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-01-17       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  What is the best pregnancy rate that may be expected from vasectomy reversal?

Authors:  I D Sharlip
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of vasectomy reversal.

Authors:  Ryan M Dickey; Alexander W Pastuszak; Tariq S Hakky; Aravind Chandrashekar; Ranjith Ramasamy; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Current techniques in microsurgical reversal surgery.

Authors:  Dominick J Carbone; Joseph J Phillips
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.862

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.