Literature DB >> 12084188

The role of transrectal ultrasound in diagnosing prostate cancer.

Richard Clements1.   

Abstract

The availability of the prostate-specific antigen test to screen for prostate cancer has caused a significant workload burden for urologists and radiologists alike. Prostate cancer is common in our aging population and most cancers are now definitively detected by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostatic needle biopsy. TRUS alone has limited potential to identify prostatic cancer because of frequent multifocality of cancer within the prostate, the variable sonographic appearance of prostatic tumors, the poor specificity of focal ultrasonic abnormalities, and the substantial percentage of isoechoic prostate cancers (which cannot be differentiated from adjacent benign tissues with imaging). Developments in TRUS equipment over the past decade include the use of color and power Doppler, higher frequencies, broad bandwidth technologies, and harmonic, contrast harmonic, and pulse inversion imaging. All of these improvements may enhance detection of subtle focal sonographic abnormalities within the prostate. Ultrasonic contrast agents can aid the visualization of subtle alterations in prostatic echotexture by highlighting changes in microvasculature. It is possible that Doppler techniques and contrast agents have the potential to reveal prognostic information about cancer in individual patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12084188     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-002-0064-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   2.862


  48 in total

1.  Prevalence and predictors of a positive repeat transrectal ultrasound guided needle biopsy of the prostate.

Authors:  N E Fleshner; M O'Sullivan; W R Fair
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  L A Eskew; R L Bare; D L McCullough
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Clinical significance of small (less than 0.2 cm3) hypoechoic lesions in men with normal digital rectal examinations and prostate-specific antigen levels less than 10 ng/mL.

Authors:  N E Fleshner; M O'Sullivan; C Premdass; W R Fair
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Hypoechoic lesions of the prostate: clinical relevance of tumor size, digital rectal examination, and prostate-specific antigen.

Authors:  F Lee; S Torp-Pedersen; P J Littrup; R D McLeary; T A McHugh; A P Smid; P J Stella; G S Borlaza
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Predictors of prostate carcinoma: accuracy of gray-scale and color Doppler US and serum markers.

Authors:  E Kuligowska; M A Barish; H M Fenlon; M Blake
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  The prostatic gland: malignancies other than adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  S L Varghese; G D Grossfeld
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced power Doppler ultrasonography and conventional examination methods: the value of diagnostic predictors of prostate cancer.

Authors:  D Unal; J P Sedelaar; R G Aarnink; G J van Leenders; H Wijkstra; F M Debruyne; J J de la Rosette
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Prostate cancer staging: correlation between ultrasound determined tumor contact length and pathologically confirmed extraprostatic extension.

Authors:  O Ukimura; P Troncoso; E I Ramirez; R J Babaian
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  The optimal systematic prostate biopsy scheme should include 8 rather than 6 biopsies: results of a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  J C Presti; J J Chang; V Bhargava; K Shinohara
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Zonal distribution of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Correlation with histologic pattern and direction of spread.

Authors:  J E McNeal; E A Redwine; F S Freiha; T A Stamey
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 6.394

View more
  2 in total

1.  Progress in the imaging of the prostate gland.

Authors:  J P M Sedelaar; J J M C H de la Rosette; F M J Debruyne
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.862

2.  Multiparametric dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Rogier R Wildeboer; Arnoud W Postema; Libertario Demi; Maarten P J Kuenen; Hessel Wijkstra; Massimo Mischi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 5.315

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.