Literature DB >> 8976250

Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate.

L A Eskew1, R L Bare, D L McCullough.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The number of patients undergoing prostate biopsy has dramatically increased due to prostate specific antigen screening. The low specificity of this screening tool requires prostate biopsy for diagnosis of prostate cancer. The sextant biopsy technique has been used widely with success in diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. However, concern has arisen that the original sextant method may not include an adequate sampling of the prostate. For many years we have used a method of prostate biopsy that, in addition to sextant biopsies, takes additional biopsies in a systematic fashion, which we call the 5 region prostate biopsy. We conducted a prospective study to determine if our 5 region prostate biopsy technique significantly increases the chances of finding carcinoma of the prostate compared to the sextant biopsy technique.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 119 patients underwent transrectal ultrasound guided needle biopsy of the prostate. In addition to sextant biopsies, cores were taken from the far lateral and mid regions of the gland. Pathological findings of the additional regions were compared to those of the sextant regions.
RESULTS: Of the 48 patients with prostate cancer 17 (35%) had carcinomas only in the additional regions, which would have remained undetected had the sextant biopsy technique been used alone (p < 0.05). Of these additional cancers 83% had Gleason scores of 6 or more.
CONCLUSIONS: We introduce the 5 region technique of prostate biopsy as a means of significantly increasing the diagnostic yield of prostate biopsy in finding carcinoma of the prostate. We have found this technique to be safe, efficacious and superior to the sextant method of biopsy in identifying prostate cancer at an early but significant stage. The greatest use of the 5 region biopsy technique is in patients who have prostate specific antigen levels between 4 and 10 ng./ml.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 8976250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  86 in total

Review 1.  Prostate cancer: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  S N Pentyala; J Lee; K Hsieh; W C Waltzer; A Trocchia; L Musacchia; M J Rebecchi; S A Khan
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 2.  The technique of ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Imre Romics
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-09-29       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  CUA guidelines on prostate biopsy methodology.

Authors:  Assaad El-Hakim; Sabri Moussa
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  When prostate cancer remains undetectable: The dilemma.

Authors:  Mahmoud Othman Mustafa; Louis Pisters
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-03

5.  Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Green Tea Catechins for Prostate Cancer Prevention.

Authors:  Nagi B Kumar; Julio Pow-Sang; Kathleen M Egan; Philippe E Spiess; Shohreh Dickinson; Raoul Salup; Mohamed Helal; Jerry McLarty; Christopher R Williams; Fred Schreiber; Howard L Parnes; Said Sebti; Aslam Kazi; Loveleen Kang; Gwen Quinn; Tiffany Smith; Binglin Yue; Karen Diaz; Ganna Chornokur; Theresa Crocker; Michael J Schell
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2015-04-14

6.  Prostate biopsy: targeting cancer for detection and therapy.

Authors:  Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2006

7.  Optimizing prostate biopsy strategies for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

8.  Three-dimensional combination of transrectal and transperineal biopsies for efficient detection of stage T1c prostate cancer.

Authors:  Satoru Kawakami; Nobuhiko Hyochi; Junji Yonese; Masataka Yano; Yasuhisa Fujii; Yukio Kageyama; Iwao Fukui; Kazunori Kihara
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 9.  Anatomic and Molecular Imaging in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Eric T Miller; Amirali Salmasi; Robert E Reiter
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 6.915

10.  Follow-up of men obtaining a six-core versus a ten-core benign prostate biopsy 7 years previously.

Authors:  Clemens Brossner; Stefan Madersbacher; Phillip de Mare; Anton Ponholzer; Bader Al-Ali; Michael Rauchenwald
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2005-12-03       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.