Literature DB >> 12072963

Dynamic docking and electron transfer between myoglobin and cytochrome b(5).

Zhao-Xun Liang1, Min Jiang, Qing Ning, Brian M Hoffman.   

Abstract

The interaction of trypsin-digested bovine cytochrome b(5) (cyt b(5)) with horse heart myoglobin (Mb) and the interprotein electron transfer (ET) between these redox partners have been studied to gain better understanding of ET processes between weakly bound protein partners. The bimolecular rate constant ( k(2)) for photo-induced ET between zinc-substituted Mb (ZnMb) and cyt b(5) decreases with increasing ionic strength, consistent with the predominantly electrostatic character of this complex. The formation of a protein-protein complex has been confirmed and the binding affinities of metMb and ZnMb for cyt b(5) have been measured by two techniques: (1)H NMR titrations at pH 6.0 give binding constants of K(a) approximately (1.0+/-0.1)x10(3) M(-1) for metMb and K(a) approximately (0.75+/-0.1)x10(3) M(-1) for ZnMb; isothermal calorimetry gives K(a) approximately (0.35+/-0.1)x10(3) M(-1) for ZnMb. Brownian dynamic (BD) simulations show that cyt b(5) binds over a broad surface of Mb that includes its heme edge. The experimental results are described in terms of a dynamic docking model which proposes that Mb binds cyt b(5) in a large ensemble of protein binding conformations, not one or a few dominant ones, but that only a small subset are ET reactive. Aided by the BD simulations, this model explains why k(2) decreases with increasing pH: increasing pH not only weakens the binding affinity but also reduces the number of binding conformations with high ET reactivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12072963     DOI: 10.1007/s00775-001-0332-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem        ISSN: 0949-8257            Impact factor:   3.358


  8 in total

1.  A Protein Structure Initiative approach to expression, purification, and in situ delivery of human cytochrome b5 to membrane vesicles.

Authors:  Pablo Sobrado; Michael A Goren; Declan James; Carissa K Amundson; Brian G Fox
Journal:  Protein Expr Purif       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 1.650

2.  Comparative protein interactomics of neuroglobin and myoglobin.

Authors:  Bryan A Haines; Darcy A Davis; Artem Zykovich; Botao Peng; Rammohan Rao; Sean D Mooney; Kunlin Jin; David A Greenberg
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 5.372

3.  Photoinitiated singlet and triplet electron transfer across a redesigned [myoglobin, cytochrome b5] interface.

Authors:  Judith M Nocek; Amanda K Knutson; Peng Xiong; Nadia Petlakh Co; Brian M Hoffman
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  The orientations of cytochrome c in the highly dynamic complex with cytochrome b5 visualized by NMR and docking using HADDOCK.

Authors:  Alexander N Volkov; Davide Ferrari; Jonathan A R Worrall; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Marcellus Ubbink
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 5.  Another look at the interaction between mitochondrial cytochrome c and flavocytochrome b (2).

Authors:  Florence Lederer
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 1.733

6.  Evolving the [myoglobin, cytochrome b(5)] complex from dynamic toward simple docking: charging the electron transfer reactive patch.

Authors:  Ethan N Trana; Judith M Nocek; Amanda K Knutson; Brian M Hoffman
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Electrostatic redesign of the [myoglobin, cytochrome b5] interface to create a well-defined docked complex with rapid interprotein electron transfer.

Authors:  Peng Xiong; Judith M Nocek; Amanda K K Griffin; Jingyun Wang; Brian M Hoffman
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Symmetrized photoinitiated electron flow within the [myoglobin:cytochrome b₅] complex on singlet and triplet time scales: energetics vs dynamics.

Authors:  Nadia Petlakh Co; Ryan M Young; Amanda L Smeigh; Michael R Wasielewski; Brian M Hoffman
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 15.419

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.