Literature DB >> 12071774

Use of screening algorithms and computer systems to efficiently signal higher-than-expected combinations of drugs and events in the US FDA's spontaneous reports database.

Ana Szarfman1, Stella G Machado, Robert T O'Neill.   

Abstract

Since 1998, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been exploring new automated and rapid Bayesian data mining techniques. These techniques have been used to systematically screen the FDA's huge MedWatch database of voluntary reports of adverse drug events for possible events of concern. The data mining method currently being used is the Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS) program that replaced the Gamma Poisson Shrinker (GPS) program we originally used with the legacy database. The MGPS algorithm, the technical aspects of which are summarised in this paper, computes signal scores for pairs, and for higher-order (e.g. triplet, quadruplet) combinations of drugs and events that are significantly more frequent than their pair-wise associations would predict. MGPS generates consistent, redundant, and replicable signals while minimising random patterns. Signals are generated without using external exposure data, adverse event background information, or medical information on adverse drug reactions. The MGPS interface streamlines multiple input-output processes that previously had been manually integrated. The system, however, cannot distinguish between already-known associations and new associations, so the reviewers must filter these events. In addition to detecting possible serious single-drug adverse event problems, MGPS is currently being evaluated to detect possible synergistic interactions between drugs (drug interactions) and adverse events (syndromes), and to detect differences among subgroups defined by gender and by age, such as paediatrics and geriatrics. In the current data, only 3.4% of all 1.2 million drug-event pairs ever reported (with frequencies > or = 1) generate signals [lower 95% confidence interval limit of the adjusted ratios of the observed counts over expected (O/E) counts (denoted EB05) of > or = 2]. The total frequency count that contributed to signals comprised 23% (2.4 million) of the total number, 10.4 million of drug-event pairs reported, greatly facilitating a more focused follow-up and evaluation. The algorithm provides an objective, systematic view of the data alerting reviewers to critically important, new safety signals. The study of signals detected by current methods, signals stored in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research's Monitoring Adverse Reports Tracking System, and the signals regarding cerivastatin, a cholesterol-lowering drug voluntarily withdrawn from the market in August 2001, exemplify the potential of data mining to improve early signal detection. The operating characteristics of data mining in detecting early safety signals, exemplified by studying a drug recently well characterised by large clinical trials confirms our experience that the signals generated by data mining have high enough specificity to deserve further investigation. The application of these tools may ultimately improve usage recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12071774     DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200225060-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  1 in total

1.  Data mining in the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS): early detection of intussusception and other events after rotavirus vaccination.

Authors:  M T Niu; D E Erwin; M M Braun
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2001-09-14       Impact factor: 3.641

  1 in total
  181 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative methods in pharmacovigilance: focus on signal detection.

Authors:  Manfred Hauben; Xiaofeng Zhou
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Application of quantitative signal detection in the Dutch spontaneous reporting system for adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  Eugène van Puijenbroek; Willem Diemont; Kees van Grootheest
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Application of data mining techniques in pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Andrew M Wilson; Lehana Thabane; Anne Holbrook
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  The periodic safety update report as a pharmacovigilance tool.

Authors:  Michael J Klepper
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Using MedDRA: implications for risk management.

Authors:  Elliot G Brown
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 6.  The general practice research database: role in pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Louise Wood; Carlos Martinez
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Trimethoprim-induced hyperkalaemia -- lessons in data mining.

Authors:  Manfred Hauben
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Implementation of an automated signal detection method in the French pharmacovigilance database: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Véronique Pizzoglio; Ismaïl Ahmed; Pascal Auriche; Pascale Tuber-Bitter; Françoise Haramburu; Carmen Kreft-Jaïs; Ghada Miremont-Salamé
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Propylthiouracil-induced hepatotoxicity and death. Hopefully, never more.

Authors:  Saul Malozowski; Ana Chiesa
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.958

10.  Biclustering of adverse drug events in the FDA's spontaneous reporting system.

Authors:  R Harpaz; H Perez; H S Chase; R Rabadan; G Hripcsak; C Friedman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 6.875

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.