Literature DB >> 27812797

Adaptive Management as an Effective Strategy: Interdisciplinary Perceptions for Natural Resources Management.

Lindsay M Dreiss1, Jan-Michael Hessenauer2, Lucas R Nathan2, Kelly M O'Connor2, Marjorie R Liberati2, Danielle P Kloster2, Janet R Barclay2, Jason C Vokoun2, Anita T Morzillo2.   

Abstract

Adaptive management is a well-established approach to managing natural resources, but there is little evidence demonstrating effectiveness of adaptive management over traditional management techniques. Peer-reviewed literature attempts to draw conclusions about adaptive management effectiveness using social perceptions, but those studies are largely restricted to employees of US federal organizations. To gain a more comprehensive insight into perceived adaptive management effectiveness, this study aimed to broaden the suite of disciplines, professional affiliations, and geographic backgrounds represented by both practitioners and scholars. A questionnaire contained a series of questions concerning factors that lead to or inhibit effective management, followed by another set of questions focused on adaptive management. Using a continuum representing strategies of both adaptive management and traditional management, respondents selected those strategies that they perceived as being effective. Overall, characteristics (i.e., strategies, stakeholders, and barriers) identified by respondents as contributing to effective management closely aligned with adaptive management. Responses were correlated to the type of adaptive management experience rather than an individual's discipline, occupational, or regional affiliation. In particular, perceptions of characteristics contributing to adaptive management effectiveness varied between respondents who identified as adaptive management scholars (i.e., no implementation experience) and adaptive management practitioners. Together, these results supported two concepts that make adaptive management effective: practitioners emphasized adaptive management's value as a long-term approach and scholars noted the importance of stakeholder involvement. Even so, more communication between practitioners and scholars regarding adaptive management effectiveness could promote interdisciplinary learning and problem solving for improved resources management.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive management; Barriers; Effective; Interdisciplinary; Perceptions; Stakeholders

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27812797     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-016-0785-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  13 in total

Review 1.  Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management.

Authors:  Christopher M Raymond; Ioan Fazey; Mark S Reed; Lindsay C Stringer; Guy M Robinson; Anna C Evely
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 6.789

Review 2.  Evaluating the efficacy of adaptive management approaches: is there a formula for success?

Authors:  Jamie E McFadden; Tim L Hiller; Andrew J Tyre
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 6.789

3.  Pathology and failure in the design and implementation of adaptive management.

Authors:  Craig R Allen; Lance H Gunderson
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 6.789

4.  Theory into practice: implementing ecosystem management objectives in the USDA Forest Service.

Authors:  Kelly F Butler; Tomas M Koontz
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Understanding barriers to implementation of an adaptive land management program.

Authors:  Susan K Jacobson; Julie K Morris; J Scott Sanders; Eugene N Wiley; Michael Brooks; Robert E Bennetts; H Franklin Percival; Susan Marynowski
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.560

6.  Optimal adaptive management for the translocation of a threatened species.

Authors:  Tracy M Rout; Cindy E Hauser; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.657

7.  Collaboration in natural resource governance: reconciling stakeholder expectations in deer management in Scotland.

Authors:  Althea L Davies; Rehema M White
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 6.789

Review 8.  Knowing but not doing: selecting priority conservation areas and the research-implementation gap.

Authors:  Andrew T Knight; Richard M Cowling; Mathieu Rouget; Andrew Balmford; Amanda T Lombard; Bruce M Campbell
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 6.560

Review 9.  Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity.

Authors:  Bradley J Cardinale; J Emmett Duffy; Andrew Gonzalez; David U Hooper; Charles Perrings; Patrick Venail; Anita Narwani; Georgina M Mace; David Tilman; David A Wardle; Ann P Kinzig; Gretchen C Daily; Michel Loreau; James B Grace; Anne Larigauderie; Diane S Srivastava; Shahid Naeem
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Adaptive management: from more talk to real action.

Authors:  Byron K Williams; Eleanor D Brown
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 3.266

View more
  1 in total

1.  Exploring Institutional Mechanisms for Scientific Input into the Management Cycle of the National Protected Area Network of Peru: Gaps and Opportunities.

Authors:  M D López-Rodríguez; H Castro; M Arenas; J M Requena-Mullor; A Cano; E Valenzuela; J Cabello
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.266

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.