Literature DB >> 21933199

Subjective perceptions associated with the ascending and descending slopes of breath alcohol exposure vary with recent drinking history.

Leah Wetherill1, Sandra L Morzorati, Tatiana Foroud, Kyle Windisch, Todd Darlington, Ulrich S Zimmerman, Martin H Plawecki, Sean J O'Connor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The differentiator model predicts that individuals with a positive family history of alcoholism (FHA) or heavy alcohol consumers will feel more sensitive to the effects of alcohol on the ascending phase of the blood alcohol content while feeling less sedated on the descending phase. This study tested whether subjective perceptions are sensitive to the slope of breath alcohol concentration (BrAC) and whether that sensitivity is associated with an FHA and/or recent drinking history (RDH).
METHODS: Family-history-positive (FHP, n = 27) and family-history-negative (FHN, n = 27) young adult nondependent drinkers were infused intravenously with alcohol in 2 sessions separated by 1 week. After 20 minutes, one session had an ascending BrAC (+3.0 mg%/min), while the other session had a descending BrAC (-1 mg%/min). The BrAC for both sessions at this point was approximately 60 mg%, referred to as the crossover point. Subjective perceptions of intoxication, high, stimulated, and sedation were sampled frequently and then interpolated to the crossover point. Within-subject differences between ascending and descending responses were examined for associations with FHA and/or RDH.
RESULTS: Recent moderate drinkers reported increased perceptions of feeling intoxicated (p < 0.023) and high (p < 0.023) on the ascending slope compared with the descending slope. In contrast, recent light drinkers felt more intoxicated and high on the descending slope.
CONCLUSIONS: Subjective perceptions in young adult social drinkers depend on the slope of the BrAC when examined in association with RDH. These results support the differentiator model hypothesis concerning the ascending slope and suggest that moderate alcohol consumers could be at risk for increased alcohol consumption because they feel more intoxicated and high on the ascending slope. Subjects did not feel less sedated on the descending slope, contrary to the differentiator model but replicating several previous studies.
Copyright © 2011 by the Research Society on Alcoholism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21933199      PMCID: PMC3288407          DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01642.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.455


  30 in total

Review 1.  Psychiatric 'diseases' versus behavioral disorders and degree of genetic influence.

Authors:  O J Bienvenu; D S Davydow; K S Kendler
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 7.723

2.  Acute alcohol tolerance on subjective intoxication and simulated driving performance in binge drinkers.

Authors:  Cecile A Marczinski; Mark T Fillmore
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2009-06

3.  Comment on the paper by Quinn and Fromme entitled subjective response to alcohol challenge: a quantitative review.

Authors:  Marc A Schuckit
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 4.  Subjective response to alcohol: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Meghan E Morean; William R Corbin
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.455

5.  Rewarding, stimulant, and sedative alcohol responses and relationship to future binge drinking.

Authors:  Andrea C King; Harriet de Wit; Patrick J McNamara; Dingcai Cao
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2011-04

Review 6.  Subjective response to alcohol challenge: a quantitative review.

Authors:  Patrick D Quinn; Kim Fromme
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.455

7.  Familial transmission and heritability of childhood disruptive disorders.

Authors:  Marina A Bornovalova; Brian M Hicks; William G Iacono; Matt McGue
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 18.112

8.  The relationships of the level of response to alcohol and additional characteristics to alcohol use disorders across adulthood: a discrete-time survival analysis.

Authors:  Ryan S Trim; Marc A Schuckit; Tom L Smith
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  Prevalence, correlates, disability, and comorbidity of DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence in the United States: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.

Authors:  Deborah S Hasin; Frederick S Stinson; Elizabeth Ogburn; Bridget F Grant
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2007-07

Review 10.  Studying alcohol elimination using the alcohol clamp method.

Authors:  Vijay A Ramchandani; Sean O'Connor
Journal:  Alcohol Res Health       Date:  2006
View more
  13 in total

1.  Vulnerability for Alcohol Use Disorder and Rate of Alcohol Consumption.

Authors:  Joshua L Gowin; Matthew E Sloan; Bethany L Stangl; Vatsalya Vatsalya; Vijay A Ramchandani
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 18.112

2.  Association between overall rate of change in rising breath alcohol concentration and the magnitude of acute tolerance of subjective intoxication via the Mellanby method.

Authors:  David H Morris; Michael T Amlung; Chia-Lin Tsai; Denis M McCarthy
Journal:  Hum Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 1.672

3.  Dose-dependent effects of intravenous alcohol administration on cerebral blood flow in young adults.

Authors:  Nicole M Strang; Eric D Claus; Vijay A Ramchandani; Ariel Graff-Guerrero; Isabelle Boileau; Christian S Hendershot
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Stress vulnerability and alcohol use and consequences: From human laboratory studies to clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Vijay A Ramchandani; Bethany L Stangl; Sara K Blaine; Martin H Plawecki; Melanie L Schwandt; Laura E Kwako; Rajita Sinha; Melissa A Cyders; Sean O'Connor; Samir Zakhari
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 2.405

5.  Characterization of hangover following intravenous alcohol exposure in social drinkers: methodological and clinical implications.

Authors:  Vatsalya Vatsalya; Bethany L Stangl; Veronica Y Schmidt; Vijay A Ramchandani
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.280

6.  Alcohol exposure rate control through physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling.

Authors:  Martin H Plawecki; Ulrich S Zimmermann; Victor Vitvitskiy; Peter C Doerschuk; David Crabb; Sean O'Connor
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 7.  Experimental psychopathology paradigms for alcohol use disorders: Applications for translational research.

Authors:  Spencer Bujarski; Lara A Ray
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2016-05-28

8.  Differences in subjective response to alcohol in heavy- and light-drinking Chinese men versus Caucasian American men.

Authors:  Sandra Y Rueger; Hongxing Hu; Patrick McNamara; Dingcai Cao; Wei Hao; Andrea C King
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 9.  Alcohol Tolerance in Human Laboratory Studies for Development of Medications to treat Alcohol Use Disorder.

Authors:  Carolina L Haass-Koffler; Roberta Perciballi
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 2.826

10.  A prospective study of genetic factors, human laboratory phenotypes, and heavy drinking in late adolescence.

Authors:  Christian S Hendershot; Jeffrey D Wardell; Matthew D McPhee; Vijay A Ramchandani
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 4.280

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.