Literature DB >> 12067683

Use of minimally invasive oesophagectomy for cancer of the oesophagus.

Simon Law1, John Wong.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery has had a great effect on all branches of surgery, although its use for oesophageal cancer is controversial because of the technical complexity of the techniques involved and its uncertain benefits. We review the minimally invasive techniques that have been used for oesophagectomy. The methods are certainly feasible and can be done safely in experienced centres, but postoperative morbidity and mortality rates are not substantially reduced by the procedure. There are also concerns regarding the adequacy of tumour clearance. Further evaluation of the role of minimally invasive techniques in oesophageal cancer would require larger scale studies, preferably randomised controlled trials, in experienced centres. However, given that survival rates have not changed, proving that minimally invasive techniques are more effective than conventional methods of oesophagectomy, will be a difficult task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12067683     DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(02)00712-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  11 in total

Review 1.  Current management of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Simon Law; John Wong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Surgical treatment of superficial esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Mitsuo Tachibana; Shoichi Kinugasa; Muneaki Shibakita; Yasuhito Tonomoto; Shinji Hattori; Ryoji Hyakudomi; Hiroshi Yoshimura; Dipok Kumar Dhar; Naofumi Nagasue
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-07-08       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  First experience with robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagolymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  R van Hillegersberg; J Boone; W A Draaisma; I A M J Broeders; M J M M Giezeman; I H M Borel Rinkes
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Analysis of respiratory complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: preliminary observation of persistent aspiration risk.

Authors:  B Zane Atkins; Daniel L Fortes; Kevin T Watkins
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: laparoscopic transhiatal procedure or thoracoscopy in prone position followed by laparoscopy?

Authors:  G Dapri; J Himpens; G B Cadière
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Mckeown esophagogastrectomy.

Authors:  Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Improved prognosis of resected esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Hubert J Stein; Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Robotically assisted laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy.

Authors:  C A Galvani; M V Gorodner; F Moser; G Jacobsen; C Chretien; N J Espat; P Donahue; S Horgan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with manual esogastric anastomosis by thoracoscopy in prone position and laparoscopy.

Authors:  G B Cadière; G Dapri; J Himpens; L Fodderie; A Rajan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Robotic transthoracic esophagectomy.

Authors:  Shailesh Puntambekar; Rahul Kenawadekar; Sanjay Kumar; Saurabh Joshi; Geetanjali Agarwal; Sunil Reddy; Jainul Mallik
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.