Literature DB >> 12062771

Human frequency-following responses: representation of steady-state synthetic vowels.

Ananthanarayan Krishnan1.   

Abstract

Auditory nerve single-unit population studies have demonstrated that phase-locking plays a dominant role in the neural encoding of the spectrum of speech sounds. Given this, it was reasoned that the phase-locked neural activity underlying the scalp-recorded human frequency-following response (FFR) might preserve information about certain acoustic features of speech sounds. It was recently reported (Ananthanarayan, A.K., 1999. J. Audiol. Neurootol. 4, 95-103) that the FFR spectrum to simple two-tone approximations of several English back vowels does indeed contain peaks corresponding to the first and second formant frequencies. In this investigation FFRs to the more complex steady-state synthetic English back vowels (/u/, /)/, and /a/) were evaluated. FFRs were obtained from 10 normal-hearing human adults at 85, 75, 65, and 55 dB normal-hearing level (nHL). Spectrum analyses of the FFRs revealed distinct peaks at harmonics adjacent to the first and the second formants across all levels suggesting that phase-locked activity among two distinct populations of neurons is indeed preserved in the FFR. For each vowel the spectral peaks at first formant harmonics dominated the spectrum at high stimulus levels suggesting formant capture. The observation of less robust peaks for harmonics between the formants may very well suggest selective suppression to enhance spectral peaks at the formant frequencies. These results suggest that the scalp-recorded FFR may provide for a non-invasive analytic window to evaluate neural encoding of speech sounds in the brainstem of normal-hearing individuals and how this encoding may be degraded subsequent to cochlear hearing impairment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12062771     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(02)00327-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  47 in total

1.  Neural representation of pitch salience in the human brainstem revealed by psychophysical and electrophysiological indices.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Gavin M Bidelman; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Auditory midbrain representation of a break in interaural correlation.

Authors:  Qian Wang; Liang Li
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The neural encoding of formant frequencies contributing to vowel identification in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Kelly Tremblay; Christopher G Clinard; Richard A Wright; Elad Sagi; Mario Svirsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  LANGUAGE EXPERIENCE SHAPES PROCESSING OF PITCH RELEVANT INFORMATION IN THE HUMAN BRAINSTEM AND AUDITORY CORTEX: ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Acoust Aust       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.500

5.  A comparison of spectral magnitude and phase-locking value analyses of the frequency-following response to complex tones.

Authors:  Li Zhu; Hari Bharadwaj; Jing Xia; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Stimulus rate and subcortical auditory processing of speech.

Authors:  Jennifer L Krizman; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 1.854

7.  Training to improve hearing speech in noise: biological mechanisms.

Authors:  Judy H Song; Erika Skoe; Karen Banai; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Rapid acquisition of auditory subcortical steady state responses using multichannel recordings.

Authors:  Hari M Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Reading and subcortical auditory function.

Authors:  Karen Banai; Jane Hornickel; Erika Skoe; Trent Nicol; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 10.  Auditory brain stem response to complex sounds: a tutorial.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.