Literature DB >> 12061033

Women's experiences of pelvic examination: an interview study.

M Oscarsson1, E Benzein.   

Abstract

This qualitative study was designed to explore women's experiences when undergoing pelvic examination (PE). Earlier studies have shown that women are positive to the PE in general, but when describing the specific parts of the procedure, negative terms are used, for example, fear, pain, feelings of humiliation and embarrassment. Data were collected by tape-recorded narrative interviews, with six women aged 20-41 years, who had undergone several PE. A qualitative content analysis was used and three main themes were revealed: the experience of being exposed, the experience of having a trusting relationship with the examiner and the experience of a comforting environment. The findings revealed that it was not only the PE that affected the women, but also the relationship to the examiner. The experience of being exposed could be decreased by, for example, separating the body from the person, being able to relax and by having a trusting relationship with the examiner. The women appreciated having a homelike environment in the outpatient clinic. If women are met and confirmed in accordance with these findings, the examination may be an event without negative experiences for them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12061033     DOI: 10.3109/01674820209093411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0167-482X            Impact factor:   2.949


  6 in total

1.  Factors Influencing Adolescent and Young Adults' First Pelvic Examination Experiences: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Ava F Bryan; Julie Chor
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 1.814

2.  Reproductive Health in Women with Physical Disability: A Conceptual Framework for the Development of New Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Claire Z Kalpakjian; Jodi M Kreschmer; Mary D Slavin; Pamela A Kisala; Elisabeth H Quint; Nancy D Chiaravalloti; Natalie Jenkins; Tamara Bushnik; Dagmar Amtmann; David S Tulsky; Roxanne Madrid; Rebecca Parten; Michael Evitts; Carolyn L Grawi
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  'I do not need to... I do not want to... I do not give it priority...'--why women choose not to attend cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Marie G Oscarsson; Barbro E Wijma; Eva G Benzein
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  When fetal hydronephrosis is suspected antenatally--a qualitative study.

Authors:  Marie Oscarsson; Tomas Gottvall; Katarina Swahnberg
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  The paradox of vaginal examination practice during normal childbirth: Palestinian women's feelings, opinions, knowledge and experiences.

Authors:  Sahar J Hassan; Johanne Sundby; Abdullatif Husseini; Espen Bjertness
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 3.223

6.  Effects of Using Perineal Underwear on Discomfort and Shame in Angiography Patients.

Authors:  Eunhye Shin; Hanna Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.