Ava F Bryan1, Julie Chor2. 1. The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: jchormd@gmail.com.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To understand the factors that influence individuals' experiences during their first pelvic examination. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTIONS, AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We conducted semistructured interviews with adolescents and young adults, aged 18-24, who had received at least 1 pelvic examination. Interviews explored contextual factors of the first pelvic examination, including visit acuity and clinical setting and individuals' experiences with the pelvic examination itself and elicited recommendations on how to improve the examination experience. Interviews were transcribed and computer-assisted content analysis was performed; salient themes are presented. RESULTS: Thirty participants completed interviews. Nineteen participants described their first pelvic examination experience as positive; 11 described this examination as a negative or neutral experience. Factors influencing the experience include the examination indication and acuity, examination location and physical space, provider features, relational and interpersonal features, and procedural aspects. Recommendations included: (1) establish rapport and educate before the examination; (2) establish practices to orient patients; (3) make no assumptions about identity; and (4) elicit continuous feedback. CONCLUSION: Individuals' first pelvic examination experiences are influenced by a variety of factors. Although some factors are directly modifiable by providers, other factors that might not be modifiable are important to elicit to optimize the examination experience. These findings call for best practice guidelines and educational interventions to prepare providers to perform the first pelvic examination.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To understand the factors that influence individuals' experiences during their first pelvic examination. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTIONS, AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We conducted semistructured interviews with adolescents and young adults, aged 18-24, who had received at least 1 pelvic examination. Interviews explored contextual factors of the first pelvic examination, including visit acuity and clinical setting and individuals' experiences with the pelvic examination itself and elicited recommendations on how to improve the examination experience. Interviews were transcribed and computer-assisted content analysis was performed; salient themes are presented. RESULTS: Thirty participants completed interviews. Nineteen participants described their first pelvic examination experience as positive; 11 described this examination as a negative or neutral experience. Factors influencing the experience include the examination indication and acuity, examination location and physical space, provider features, relational and interpersonal features, and procedural aspects. Recommendations included: (1) establish rapport and educate before the examination; (2) establish practices to orient patients; (3) make no assumptions about identity; and (4) elicit continuous feedback. CONCLUSION: Individuals' first pelvic examination experiences are influenced by a variety of factors. Although some factors are directly modifiable by providers, other factors that might not be modifiable are important to elicit to optimize the examination experience. These findings call for best practice guidelines and educational interventions to prepare providers to perform the first pelvic examination.
Authors: R Bodden-Heidrich; S Walter; S Teutenberger; V Küppers; V Pelzer; I Rechenberger; H G Bender Journal: J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 1.814