Literature DB >> 33802344

Effects of Using Perineal Underwear on Discomfort and Shame in Angiography Patients.

Eunhye Shin1, Hanna Lee2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop and apply a type of perineal underwear that protects the patient's physical privacy and to examine its effects on perineal discomfort and shame. This study collected primary data from 44 patients who visited Kyung Hee University hospital in Seoul city and were admitted to the neurosurgery ward to undergo angiography between 7 August 2017, and 30 April 2018. In this quasi-experimental study with a nonequivalent control group posttest-only design, participants were divided into an experimental group (n = 22) and a control group (n = 22). The control group used conventional protection, which involved wearing padding around the perineum, while the experimental group wore the perineal underwear developed in this study. The underwear group showed a significantly lower degree of shame (Z = -5.39, p < 0.001) and perineal discomfort (Z = -5.88, p < 0.001) than the padding group. In the padding group, women felt significantly more shame than men did (Z = -2.48, p = 0.013). The use of the perineal underwear developed in this study significantly reduced the degree of shame and perineal discomfort in patients undergoing angiography. Such perineal underwear could also be useful for protecting patients' privacy during perineal examinations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coronary angiography; non-randomized controlled trials; perineum

Year:  2021        PMID: 33802344      PMCID: PMC7967608          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  12 in total

1.  Implementing technological safeguards to ensure patient privacy.

Authors:  Ryan Leestma
Journal:  Caring       Date:  2003-02

2.  'You expose yourself in so many ways': young women's experiences of pelvic examination.

Authors:  Hanna Grundström; Karin Wallin; Carina Berterö
Journal:  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 2.949

3.  Does privacy matter? Former patients discuss their perceptions of privacy in shared hospital rooms.

Authors:  Helen A Malcolm
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.874

4.  Patients' privacy of the person and human rights.

Authors:  Jay Woogara
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.874

5.  Pattern and consequences of first visits to obstetricians/gynecologists by adolescents: a nationwide study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Hsiao-Yun Yeh; Yu-Chun Chen; Irene Su; Li-Fang Chou; Hsiang-Tai Chao; Tzeng-Ji Chen; Shinn-Jang Hwang
Journal:  J Chin Med Assoc       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.743

6.  Women patients' preferences for female or male GPs.

Authors:  D Phillips; F Brooks
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.267

7.  Medical privacy and its value for patients.

Authors:  Eileen Meier
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.315

8.  Privacy between physicians and patients: more than a matter of confidentiality.

Authors:  R Parrott; J K Burgoon; M Burgoon; B A LePoire
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Women's experiences of pelvic examination: an interview study.

Authors:  M Oscarsson; E Benzein
Journal:  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.949

10.  Building an ethical environment improves patient privacy and satisfaction in the crowded emergency department: a quasi-experimental study.

Authors:  Yen-Ko Lin; Wei-Che Lee; Liang-Chi Kuo; Yuan-Chia Cheng; Chia-Ju Lin; Hsing-Lin Lin; Chao-Wen Chen; Tsung-Ying Lin
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.