PURPOSE: A new, potentially accommodative posterior chamber lens (PCIOL) was designed based on principles elaborated by Hanna using finite element computer simulation methods. We report 3-month postoperative results in patients. METHODS: In a prospective study, 12 eyes of 12 patients (age 45 to 87 yr) underwent phacoemulsification for cataracts and PCIOL implantation. The PCIOL, 1 CU, has haptics designed for anterior optic movement following ciliary muscle contraction. Patients were examined postoperatively after 1 and 2 days, 1, 2 and 6 weeks, and 3 months, and results were compared with a control group of 12 eyes that received standard PMMA or acrylic PCIOLs. RESULTS: Surgery was uncomplicated and all PCIOLs were well-tolerated and stable with good centration in the capsular bag. The results were (mean +/- SD [range] and median; 1 CU versus control PCIOL): near visual acuity (Birkhäuser reading chart at 35 cm) with best distance correction 0.34 +/- 0.17 (0.2 to 0.6), 0.3 (J10-J1, median J7) versus 0.15 +/- 0.07 (0.1 to 0.3), 0.15 (J16-J7, median J13), P=.001; subjective near point 59 +/- 10 cm (40 to 100 cm), 53.5 cm versus 93 +/- 20 cm (64 to 128 cm), 86 cm, P=.004; retinoscopic accommodative range 1.2 +/- 0.4 D (0.63 to 1.5 D), 1.2 D versus 0.2 +/- 0.19 D (-0.25 to 0.5 D), 0.25 D, P < .001; decrease of anterior chamber depth after 2% pilocarpine 0.63 +/- 0.16 mm (0.40 to 0.91 mm), 0.63 mm versus 0.15 +/- 0.05 mm (0.08 to 0.20 mm), 0.17 mm, P < .001. CONCLUSIONS: The new PCIOL appears to be safe at short to medium term. Our results indicate pseudophakic accommodation secondary to focus shift with this PCIOL. Additional larger and long-term studies are necessary for exact evaluation of safety and accommodative power of this new PCIOL.
PURPOSE: A new, potentially accommodative posterior chamber lens (PCIOL) was designed based on principles elaborated by Hanna using finite element computer simulation methods. We report 3-month postoperative results in patients. METHODS: In a prospective study, 12 eyes of 12 patients (age 45 to 87 yr) underwent phacoemulsification for cataracts and PCIOL implantation. The PCIOL, 1 CU, has haptics designed for anterior optic movement following ciliary muscle contraction. Patients were examined postoperatively after 1 and 2 days, 1, 2 and 6 weeks, and 3 months, and results were compared with a control group of 12 eyes that received standard PMMA or acrylic PCIOLs. RESULTS: Surgery was uncomplicated and all PCIOLs were well-tolerated and stable with good centration in the capsular bag. The results were (mean +/- SD [range] and median; 1 CU versus control PCIOL): near visual acuity (Birkhäuser reading chart at 35 cm) with best distance correction 0.34 +/- 0.17 (0.2 to 0.6), 0.3 (J10-J1, median J7) versus 0.15 +/- 0.07 (0.1 to 0.3), 0.15 (J16-J7, median J13), P=.001; subjective near point 59 +/- 10 cm (40 to 100 cm), 53.5 cm versus 93 +/- 20 cm (64 to 128 cm), 86 cm, P=.004; retinoscopic accommodative range 1.2 +/- 0.4 D (0.63 to 1.5 D), 1.2 D versus 0.2 +/- 0.19 D (-0.25 to 0.5 D), 0.25 D, P < .001; decrease of anterior chamber depth after 2% pilocarpine 0.63 +/- 0.16 mm (0.40 to 0.91 mm), 0.63 mm versus 0.15 +/- 0.05 mm (0.08 to 0.20 mm), 0.17 mm, P < .001. CONCLUSIONS: The new PCIOL appears to be safe at short to medium term. Our results indicate pseudophakic accommodation secondary to focus shift with this PCIOL. Additional larger and long-term studies are necessary for exact evaluation of safety and accommodative power of this new PCIOL.
Authors: J S Wolffsohn; S A Naroo; N K Motwani; S Shah; O A Hunt; S Mantry; M Sira; I A Cunliffe; M T Benson Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2006-03-10 Impact factor: 4.638