Literature DB >> 12043827

Kinematic analysis of butterfly turns of international and national swimmers.

C Tourny-Chollet1, D Chollet, S Hogie, C Papparodopoulos.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were (1) to evaluate the different turn phases of 200 m butterfly during competition in a 50 m pool, (2) to determine if wall contact times are related to swim speed and (3) to compare the turn variables of a European Champion with other swimmers. In the first part of the study, we assessed the turns of 22 swimmers ranked in three groups according to 200 m butterfly swim performance (fast group = 121.73+/-3.03 s, intermediate group = 126.25+/-0.55 s, slow group = 129.24+/-2.30 s). Two turn times were recorded: the first before the turn (i.e. the time it takes the swimmer's head to reach the wall from 7.5 m away) and the second after the turn (i.e. the time from the wall to the point at which the swimmer's head passes 7.5 m away). The third turn was performed significantly faster by the fast group than by the slow group, both before (P< 0.01) and after (P< 0.02) the turn. In the second part of the study, objectives (2) and (3) were evaluated among 15 swimmers based on a specific protocol. Three cameras (50 Hz) simultaneously recorded the turn; these were placed above the water 10 m before the wall, 5 m before and just above the wall. Longer contact times of the feet on the wall were associated with a faster push-off speed (P < 0. 02). The European Champion achieved an improved contact time while performing a rapid pull-out speed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12043827     DOI: 10.1080/026404102317366636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  7 in total

1.  Kinematical Comparison of the 200 m Backstroke Turns between National and Regional Level Swimmers.

Authors:  Santiago Veiga; Antonio Cala; Pablo González Frutos; Enrique Navarro
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Pacing in Swimming: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Katie E McGibbon; D B Pyne; M E Shephard; K G Thompson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Strength Training in Swimming.

Authors:  Klaus Wirth; Michael Keiner; Stefan Fuhrmann; Alfred Nimmerichter; G Gregory Haff
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 4.  Inertial Sensor Technology for Elite Swimming Performance Analysis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Robert Mooney; Gavin Corley; Alan Godfrey; Leo R Quinlan; Gearóid ÓLaighin
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-25       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Kinetic Analysis of Swimming Flip-Turn Push-Off Techniques.

Authors:  Wendi Weimar; Andrea Sumner; Braden Romer; John Fox; Jared Rehm; Brandi Decoux; Jay Patel
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-28

6.  Implications of the choice of distance-based measures in assessing and investigating tumble turn performance.

Authors:  Paul Koster; Wouter Arnoldus; Sina David; Sander Schreven; Peter J Beek
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-09-22

7.  Butterfly Sprint Swimming Technique, Analysis of Somatic and Spatial-Temporal Coordination Variables.

Authors:  Marek Strzała; Arkadiusz Stanula; Piotr Krężałek; Andrzej Ostrowski; Marcin Kaca; Grzegorz Głąb
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.193

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.