Literature DB >> 24421733

Kinematical Comparison of the 200 m Backstroke Turns between National and Regional Level Swimmers.

Santiago Veiga1, Antonio Cala2, Pablo González Frutos3, Enrique Navarro3.   

Abstract

The aims of this investigation were to determine the evolution of selected turn variables during competitive backstroke races and to compare these kinematic variables between two different levels of swimmers. Sixteen national and regional level male swimmers participant in the 200 m backstroke event at the Spanish Swimming Championships in short course (25 m) were selected to analyze their turn performances. The individual distances method with two-dimensional Direct Linear Transformation (2D-DLT) algorithms was used to perform race analyses. National level swimmers presented a shorter "turn time", a longer "distance in", a faster "underwater velocity" and "normalized underwater velocity", and a faster "stroking velocity" than regional level swimmers, whereas no significant differences were detected between levels for the "underwater distance". National level swimmers maintained similar "turn times" over the event and increased "underwater velocity" and "normalized underwater velocity" in the last (seventh) turn segment, whereas regional level swimmers increased "turn time" in the last half of the race. For both national and regional level swimmers, turn "underwater distance" during the last three turns of the race was significantly shorter while no significant differences in distance into the wall occurred throughout the race. The skill level of the swimmers has an impact on the competitive backstroke turn segments. In a 200 m event, the underwater velocity should be maximized to maintain turn proficiency, whereas turn distance must be subordinated to the average velocity. Key PointsThe underwater turn velocity is as a critical variable related to the swimmers' level of skill in a 200 m backstroke event.Best swimmers perform faster but no longer turn segments during a 200 m backstroke event.Best swimmers maintain their turn performance throughout the 200 m backstroke event by increasing the underwater velocity during the final part of the race.The turn distance out seems to be subordinated in order to maximize the average velocity during a 200 m backstroke event.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Swimming; biomechanics; motor skills; repeated measures

Year:  2013        PMID: 24421733      PMCID: PMC3873664     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  18 in total

1.  The influence of plyometric training on the freestyle tumble turn.

Authors:  J M Cossor; B A Blanksby; B C Elliott
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.319

2.  An analysis of the rollover backstroke turn by age-group swimmers.

Authors:  Brian Blanksby; Simon Skender; Bruce Elliott; Keith McElroy; Grant Landers
Journal:  Sports Biomech       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.832

3.  3D kinematic and dynamic analysis of the front crawl tumble turn in elite male swimmers.

Authors:  F Puel; J Morlier; M Avalos; M Mesnard; M Cid; P Hellard
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Analysis of the lateral push-off in the freestyle flip turn.

Authors:  Luciana Araujo; Suzana Pereira; Roberta Gatti; Elinai Freitas; Gabriel Jacomel; Helio Roesler; Joao Villas-Boas
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.337

5.  The influence of swimming start components for selected olympic and paralympic swimmers.

Authors:  Brendan Burkett; Rebecca Mellifont; Bruce Mason
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.833

Review 6.  Hydrodynamic glide efficiency in swimming.

Authors:  Roozbeh Naemi; William J Easson; Ross H Sanders
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 4.319

Review 7.  Use of deterministic models in sports and exercise biomechanics research.

Authors:  John W Chow; Duane V Knudson
Journal:  Sports Biomech       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.832

8.  Biomechanical analysis of backstroke swimming starts.

Authors:  K de Jesus; K de Jesus; P Figueiredo; P Gonçalves; S Pereira; J P Vilas-Boas; R J Fernandes
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 3.118

9.  Stroking characteristic variations in the 100-M freestyle for male swimmers of differing skill.

Authors:  D Chollet; P Pelayo; C Delaplace; C Tourny; M Sidney
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1997-08

10.  Previous cycling does not affect running efficiency during a triathlon world cup competition.

Authors:  A Cala; S Veiga; A García; E Navarro
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.637

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Strength Training in Swimming.

Authors:  Klaus Wirth; Michael Keiner; Stefan Fuhrmann; Alfred Nimmerichter; G Gregory Haff
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Differences in kinematic and match-play demands between elite winning and losing wheelchair padel players.

Authors:  Daniel Navas; Santiago Veiga; Enrique Navarro; Jesús Ramón-Llín
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Effects of Extended Underwater Sections on the Physiological and Biomechanical Parameters of Competitive Swimmers.

Authors:  Santiago Veiga; Robin Pla; Xiao Qiu; David Boudet; Alexandre Guimard
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Implications of the choice of distance-based measures in assessing and investigating tumble turn performance.

Authors:  Paul Koster; Wouter Arnoldus; Sina David; Sander Schreven; Peter J Beek
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-09-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.