Katie E McGibbon1,2, D B Pyne3,4, M E Shephard5, K G Thompson6. 1. University of Canberra Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, Building 29, Bruce, ACT, Australia. katie.mcgibbon@canberra.edu.au. 2. Queensland Academy of Sport, Nathan, QLD, Australia. katie.mcgibbon@canberra.edu.au. 3. University of Canberra Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, Building 29, Bruce, ACT, Australia. 4. Department of Physiology, Australian Institute of Sport, Bruce, ACT, Australia. 5. Queensland Academy of Sport, Nathan, QLD, Australia. 6. New South Wales Institute of Sport, Sydney Olympic Park, NSW, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pacing strategy, or how energy is distributed during exercise, can substantially impact athletic performance and is considered crucial for optimal performance in many sports. This is particularly true in swimming given the highly resistive properties of water and low mechanical efficiency of the swimming action. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review was to determine the pacing strategies utilised by competitive swimmers in competition and their reproducibility, and to examine the impact of different pacing strategies on kinematic, metabolic and performance variables. This will provide valuable and practical information to coaches and sports science practitioners. DATA SOURCES: The databases Web of Science, Scopus, SPORTDiscus and PubMed were searched for published articles up to 1 August 2017. STUDY SELECTION: A total of 23 studies examining pool-based swimming competitions or experimental trials in English-language and peer-reviewed journals were included in this review. RESULTS: In short- and middle-distance swimming events maintenance of swimming velocity is critical, whereas in long-distance events a low lap-to-lap variability and the ability to produce an end spurt in the final lap(s) are key. The most effective strategy in the individual medley (IM) is to conserve energy during the butterfly leg to optimise performance in subsequent legs. The pacing profiles of senior swimmers remain relatively stable irrespective of opponents, competition stage or type, and performance time. CONCLUSION: Implementing event-specific pacing strategies should benefit the performance of competitive swimmers. Given differences between swimmers, there is a need for greater individualisation when considering pacing strategy selection across distances and strokes.
BACKGROUND: Pacing strategy, or how energy is distributed during exercise, can substantially impact athletic performance and is considered crucial for optimal performance in many sports. This is particularly true in swimming given the highly resistive properties of water and low mechanical efficiency of the swimming action. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review was to determine the pacing strategies utilised by competitive swimmers in competition and their reproducibility, and to examine the impact of different pacing strategies on kinematic, metabolic and performance variables. This will provide valuable and practical information to coaches and sports science practitioners. DATA SOURCES: The databases Web of Science, Scopus, SPORTDiscus and PubMed were searched for published articles up to 1 August 2017. STUDY SELECTION: A total of 23 studies examining pool-based swimming competitions or experimental trials in English-language and peer-reviewed journals were included in this review. RESULTS: In short- and middle-distance swimming events maintenance of swimming velocity is critical, whereas in long-distance events a low lap-to-lap variability and the ability to produce an end spurt in the final lap(s) are key. The most effective strategy in the individual medley (IM) is to conserve energy during the butterfly leg to optimise performance in subsequent legs. The pacing profiles of senior swimmers remain relatively stable irrespective of opponents, competition stage or type, and performance time. CONCLUSION: Implementing event-specific pacing strategies should benefit the performance of competitive swimmers. Given differences between swimmers, there is a need for greater individualisation when considering pacing strategy selection across distances and strokes.
Authors: Tiago M Barbosa; José A Bragada; Víctor M Reis; Daniel A Marinho; Carlos Carvalho; António J Silva Journal: J Sci Med Sport Date: 2009-05-05 Impact factor: 4.319
Authors: C Foster; K J Hendrickson; K Peyer; B Reiner; J J deKoning; A Lucia; R A Battista; F J Hettinga; J P Porcari; G Wright Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2009-01-05 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Stephen J Bailey; Anni Vanhatalo; Fred J DiMenna; Daryl P Wilkerson; Andrew M Jones Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Graham J Mytton; David T Archer; Louise Turner; Sabrina Skorski; Andrew Renfree; Kevin G Thompson; Alan St Clair Gibson Journal: Int J Sports Physiol Perform Date: 2014-09-17 Impact factor: 4.010
Authors: Daniel A Marinho; Tiago M Barbosa; Henrique P Neiva; António J Silva; Jorge E Morais Journal: J Sports Sci Med Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 2.988
Authors: Francisco Cuenca-Fernández; Jesús J Ruiz-Navarro; Marek Polach; Raúl Arellano; Dennis-Peter Born Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-21 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Cathia Moser; Caio Victor Sousa; Rafael Reis Olher; Lee Hill; Pantelis Theodoros Nikolaidis; Thomas Rosemann; Beat Knechtle Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2021-01-20 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Phornpot Chainok; Karla de Jesus; Luis Mourão; Pedro Filipe Pereira Fonseca; Rodrigo Zacca; Ricardo J Fernandes; João Paulo Vilas-Boas Journal: Front Sports Act Living Date: 2022-03-10
Authors: Ruben De Bosscher; Christophe Dausin; Kristel Janssens; Jan Bogaert; Adrian Elliott; Olivier Ghekiere; Caroline M Van De Heyning; Prashanthan Sanders; Jonathan Kalman; Diane Fatkin; Lieven Herbots; Rik Willems; Hein Heidbuchel; André La Gerche; Guido Claessen Journal: BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Date: 2022-03-18
Authors: Luis Rodríguez; Santiago Veiga; Iker García; José M González-Ravé Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-25 Impact factor: 3.390