Literature DB >> 26000203

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR): How Can We Optimize Outcomes in CNS Research?

Mitali Wadekar1, Anil Sharma1, Gina Battaglia1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient-centered outcomes research increases patient involvement in health-related decisions with better information of benefits, risks, and options as it pertains to patient health. Patient-centered outcomes research is valuable for improving patient options in general; however, the vulnerability of patients with certain central nervous system conditions and their variable capacity to consent may pose significant challenges. Methods/review: Authors acknowledge the historical issues and address needs regarding better dissemination of knowledge in central nervous system conditions like dementia, depression, and schizophrenia. Authors propose ethical safeguards necessary to carry out sound patient-centered outcomes research in this unique population. Discussion/recommendations: To facilitate ethical patient-centered outcomes research, researchers must 1) assess the individual's mental capacity to provide consent, 2) determine vulnerability and risk of conducting research in specific subgroups, and 3) consider appointment of legally authorized representatives and/or consent monitors to ensure accurate understanding of research and ongoing direct communication with patients, especially when their future prognosis is unpredictable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CNS disorders; Patient-centered outcomes; central nervous system disorders; decision-making capacity; impaired decision-making capacity

Year:  2015        PMID: 26000203      PMCID: PMC4420167     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 2158-8333


  27 in total

1.  Are research ethics bad for our mental health?

Authors:  R Michels
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-05-06       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Autonomy, authenticity, or best interest: everyday decision-making and persons with dementia.

Authors:  S Holm
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2001

Review 3.  The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study. I: Mental illness and competence to consent to treatment.

Authors:  Paul S Appelbaum; Thomas Grisso
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  1995-04

4.  Decisional capacity and consent for schizophrenia research.

Authors:  Allison R Kaup; Laura B Dunn; Elyn R Saks; Dilip V Jeste; Barton W Palmer
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug

5.  Historical vulnerability and special scrutiny: precautions against discrimination in medical research.

Authors:  Anita Silvers
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 11.229

Review 6.  Magnitude of impairment in decisional capacity in people with schizophrenia compared to normal subjects: an overview.

Authors:  Dilip V Jeste; Colin A Depp; Barton W Palmer
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  The limitations of "vulnerability" as a protection for human research participants.

Authors:  Carol Levine; Ruth Faden; Christine Grady; Dale Hammerschmidt; Lisa Eckenwiler; Jeremy Sugarman
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 11.229

8.  The need for additional safeguards in the informed consent process in schizophrenia research.

Authors:  K K Anderson; S D Mukherjee
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Determining when impairment constitutes incapacity for informed consent in schizophrenia research.

Authors:  Scott Y H Kim; Paul S Appelbaum; Jeffrey Swan; T Scott Stroup; Joseph P McEvoy; Donald C Goff; Dilip V Jeste; J Steven Lamberti; Adrian Leibovici; Eric D Caine
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 9.319

10.  Depression, possibilities, and competence: a phenomenological perspective.

Authors:  Gerben Meynen
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2011-06
View more
  2 in total

1.  A Survey of Patient and Partner Outcome and Treatment Preferences in Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Authors:  Glenn E Smith; Melanie Chandler; Julie A Fields; Jeremiah Aakre; Dona E C Locke
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.472

2.  Priority of Treatment Outcomes for Caregivers and Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: Preliminary Analyses.

Authors:  Polaris González Barrios; Ricardo Pabón González; Sherrie M Hanna; Angela M Lunde; Julie A Fields; Dona E C Locke; Glenn E Smith
Journal:  Neurol Ther       Date:  2016-08-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.