Literature DB >> 12039831

Safety and efficacy of nurse initiated thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Asif Qasim1, Kerry Malpass, Daniel J O'Gorman, Mary E Heber.   

Abstract

PROBLEM: Delay in starting thrombolytic treatment in patients arriving at hospital with chest pain who are diagnosed as having acute myocardial infarction.
DESIGN: Audit of "door to needle times" for patients presenting with chest pain and an electrocardiogram on admission that confirmed acute myocardial infarction. A one year period in each of three phases of development was studied. BACKGROUND AND
SETTING: The goal of the national service framework for coronary heart disease is that by April 2002, 75% of eligible patients should receive thrombolysis within 30 minutes of arriving at hospital. A district general hospital introduced a strategy to improve door to needle times. In phase 1 (1989-95), patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction, referred by general practitioners, were assessed in the coronary care unit; all other patients were seen first in the accident and emergency department. In phase 2 (1995-7), all patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction were transferred directly to a fast track area within the coronary care unit, where nurses assess patients and doctors started treatment. KEY MEASURES IMPROVEMENT: Median door to needle time in phase 1 of 45 minutes (range 5-300 minutes), with 38% of patients treated within 30 minutes. Median door to needle time in phase 2 of 40 minutes (range 5-180 minutes), with 47% treated within 30 minutes STRATEGIES FOR CHANGE: In phase 3 (1997-2001), all patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction were transferred directly to the fast track area and assessed by a "coronary care thrombolysis nurse." If electrocardiography confirmed the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, the nurse could initiate thrombolytic therapy (subject to guidelines and exclusions determined by the consultant cardiologists). EFFECTS OF CHANGE: Median door to needle time in phase 3 of 15 minutes (range 5-70 minutes), with 80% of patients treated within 30 minutes. Systematic clinical review showed no cases in which a nurse initiated inappropriate thrombolysis. LESSONS LEARNT: Thrombolysis started by nurses is safe and effective in patients with acute myocardial infarction. It may provide a way by which the national service framework's targets for door to needle times can be achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12039831      PMCID: PMC1123280          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.324.7349.1328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  11 in total

1.  Effectiveness of a 'thrombolysis nurse' in shortening delay to thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J D Somauroo; P McCarten; B Appleton; A Amadi; E Rodrigues
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb

2.  Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell'Infarto Miocardico (GISSI).

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-22       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Determining patients' suitability for thrombolysis: coronary care nurses' agreement with an expert cardiological 'gold standard' as assessed by clinical and electrocardiographic 'vignettes'.

Authors:  T Quinn; A MacDermott; J Caunt
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.072

4.  Time delays in provision of thrombolytic treatment in six district hospitals. Joint Audit Committee of the British Cardiac Society and a Cardiology Committee of Royal College of Physicians of London.

Authors:  J S Birkhead
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-08-22

5.  Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of domiciliary thrombolysis by general practitioners: Grampian region early anistreplase trial. GREAT Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-09-05

6.  Effect of "fast track" admission for acute myocardial infarction on delay to thrombolysis.

Authors:  A C Pell; H C Miller; C E Robertson; K A Fox
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-01-11

7.  Prehospital recognition of AMI using independent nurse/paramedic 12-lead ECG evaluation: impact on in-hospital times to thrombolysis in a rural community hospital.

Authors:  D B Foster; J H Dufendach; C M Barkdoll; B K Mitchell
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.469

8.  Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-08-13       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patients. Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialists' (FTT) Collaborative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-02-05       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 10.  Pre-hospital thrombolysis: current status and future prospects.

Authors:  C Weston; K A Fox
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond       Date:  1991-10
View more
  9 in total

1.  Focus on emergency departments to reduce delays in thrombolysis.

Authors:  C J L Hetherington; P Doyle; J A Kayani; D F Gorman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-10-19

2.  Improving the management of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Mark W Savage; Kevin S Channer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-11-23

Review 3.  A review of interventions and system changes to improve time to reperfusion for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Kelly A McDermott; Christian D Helfrich; Anne E Sales; John S Rumsfeld; P Michael Ho; Stephan D Fihn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  24/7 Neurocritical Care Nurse Practitioner Coverage Reduced Door-to-Needle Time in Stroke Patients Treated with Tissue Plasminogen Activator.

Authors:  Jennifer L Moran; Kazuma Nakagawa; Susan M Asai; Matthew A Koenig
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 2.136

5.  Nursing role to improve care to infarct patients and patients undergoing heart surgery: 10 years' experience.

Authors:  M A M Wit; A J C M Bos-Schaap; R W M Hautvast; A A C M Heestermans; V A W M Umans
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Using simulation to estimate the cost effectiveness of improving ambulance and thrombolysis response times after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  D Chase; P Roderick; K Cooper; R Davies; T Quinn; J Raftery
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Emergency department thrombolysis improves door to needle times.

Authors:  A R Corfield; C A Graham; J N Adams; I Booth; A C McGuffie
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Stroke code simulation benefits advanced practice providers similar to neurology residents.

Authors:  Muhib Khan; Grayson L Baird; Theresa Price; Tricia Tubergen; Omran Kaskar; Michelle De Jesus; Joseph Zachariah; Adam Oostema; Raymond Scurek; Robert R Coleman; Wendy Sherman; Cynthia Hingtgen; Tamer Abdelhak; Brien Smith; Brian Silver
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2018-04

9.  Nine-year comparison of presentation and management of acute coronary syndromes in Ireland: a national cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Frank Doyle; Davida De La Harpe; Hannah McGee; Emer Shelley; Ronán Conroy
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2005-02-11       Impact factor: 2.298

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.