Literature DB >> 12039114

Obstetricians' opinions regarding patient choice in cesarean delivery.

R Gonen1, A Tamir, S Degani.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To survey the opinions of Israeli obstetricians regarding their position on patient choice cesarean delivery.
METHODS: Short anonymous questionnaires were sent by mail. The questionnaire included basic demographic data followed by three short case presentations of patients requesting cesarean delivery without a medical indication; the respondents were asked if they would consent to the patients' request. Respondents were then asked about their personal preferences on the mode of delivery, their attitude towards women's right to choose cesarean delivery, and whether obstetricians should inform their patients of this right.
RESULTS: Of the 650 questionnaires sent, 257 were returned. Most of the respondents were specialists, aged 35 years or older, and worked in hospitals. Seventy-five percent were male, and 27% had a teaching academic degree. The consent rate for patient choice cesarean delivery in the three case presentations ranged from 40% to 79%. Only 9% of the respondents said they would prefer cesarean delivery for themselves (if female) or for their partners. Forty-five percent supported women's right to choose cesarean delivery, and half of them stated that obstetricians should inform their patients of this right.
CONCLUSION: Although the vast majority (91%) of the Israeli respondents personally prefer vaginal delivery, almost half of them support women's autonomy to choose cesarean delivery. Consequently, approximately 50% of the respondents were willing to perform cesarean delivery on request because of their support of women's autonomy, despite the fact that they believe that vaginal delivery is a better option.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12039114     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01766-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  14 in total

1.  Declining fertility and the use of cesarean delivery: evidence from a population-based study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Ke-Zong M Ma; Edward C Norton; Shoou-Yih D Lee
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Impact of a cultural belief about ghost month on delivery mode in Taiwan.

Authors:  Herng-Ching Lin; Sudha Xirasagar; Yu-Chi Tung
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 3.  Pregnancy, childbirth, and sexual function: perceptions and facts.

Authors:  A O Yeniel; E Petri
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Physicians' opinions on patients' requests for specific treatments and examinations.

Authors:  Hanna K Toiviainen; Lauri Vuorenkoski; Elina Hemminki
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Non-pregnant patients' preference for delivery route.

Authors:  Andrea R Thurman; James S Zoller; Steven E Swift
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-05-14

6.  Cesarean delivery on maternal request: a western North Carolina perspective.

Authors:  Stephanie T Romero; Carol C Coulson; Shelley L Galvin
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-04

7.  Preferences and concerns for delivery: an antepartum survey.

Authors:  Jessica N Bracken; Vicki L Dryfhout; Linda M Goldenhar; Rachel N Pauls
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-07-17

8.  Obstetrical providers' preferred mode of delivery and attitude towards non-medically indicated caesarean sections: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  J C Rivo; M Amyx; V Pingray; R A Casale; A E Fiorillo; H B Krupitzki; J D Malamud; M Mendilaharzu; M L Medina; A B Del Pino; L Ribola; J A Schvartzman; G M Tartalo; M Trasmonte; S Varela; F Althabe; J M Belizán
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  Benson Relaxation Technique in Reducing Pain Intensity in Women After Cesarean Section.

Authors:  Tetti Solehati; Yeni Rustina
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2015-06-22

10.  Screening for inter-hospital differences in cesarean section rates in low-risk deliveries using administrative data: an initiative to improve the quality of care.

Authors:  Willem Aelvoet; Francis Windey; Geert Molenberghs; Hans Verstraelen; Patrick Van Reempts; Jean-Michel Foidart
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.