OBJECTIVE: To assess sexually active adolescents' attitudes toward 3 screening collection techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis using first-void urine (FVU), self-collected vaginal swab specimens, and pelvic examination with clinician-collected endocervical swab specimens. DESIGN: Participants completed a preexamination health survey, provided FVU and self-collected vaginal swab samples, and had a pelvic examination with endocervical swab specimen collection. In a confidential postexamination interview, patients ranked the 3 screening techniques according to preference and responded to qualitative positive and negative descriptors to evaluate each technique. SETTING: San Francisco area health maintenance organization and university clinics. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 155 ethnically diverse females aged 12 to 21 years, who were sexually active and were to have a pelvic examination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adolescents' preferences for and evaluations of 3 sexually transmitted disease screening techniques. RESULTS: Participants preferred the FVU test for sexually transmitted disease screening over the pelvic examination and the self-administered vaginal swab test (P<.001). These results were consistent when controlling for potentially mitigating experiences, including previous pelvic examination, tampon or condom use, and prior pregnancy. In evaluating what they liked and disliked about each of the 3 screening methods, participants described the FVU most positively, the pelvic examination most negatively, and the vaginal swab technique slightly less positively than the FVU. CONCLUSION: Most sexually active adolescents attending clinics for pelvic examination prefer to be screened for sexually transmitted diseases first by the FVU, second by the self-collected vaginal swab test, and last by the pelvic examination.
OBJECTIVE: To assess sexually active adolescents' attitudes toward 3 screening collection techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis using first-void urine (FVU), self-collected vaginal swab specimens, and pelvic examination with clinician-collected endocervical swab specimens. DESIGN:Participants completed a preexamination health survey, provided FVU and self-collected vaginal swab samples, and had a pelvic examination with endocervical swab specimen collection. In a confidential postexamination interview, patients ranked the 3 screening techniques according to preference and responded to qualitative positive and negative descriptors to evaluate each technique. SETTING: San Francisco area health maintenance organization and university clinics. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 155 ethnically diverse females aged 12 to 21 years, who were sexually active and were to have a pelvic examination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adolescents' preferences for and evaluations of 3 sexually transmitted disease screening techniques. RESULTS:Participants preferred the FVU test for sexually transmitted disease screening over the pelvic examination and the self-administered vaginal swab test (P<.001). These results were consistent when controlling for potentially mitigating experiences, including previous pelvic examination, tampon or condom use, and prior pregnancy. In evaluating what they liked and disliked about each of the 3 screening methods, participants described the FVU most positively, the pelvic examination most negatively, and the vaginal swab technique slightly less positively than the FVU. CONCLUSION: Most sexually active adolescents attending clinics for pelvic examination prefer to be screened for sexually transmitted diseases first by the FVU, second by the self-collected vaginal swab test, and last by the pelvic examination.
Authors: Elizabeth R Boskey; Shelly A Atherly-Trim; Patricia J O'Campo; Donna M Strobino; Dawn P Misra; P Misra Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2004 Jan-Feb
Authors: Jill S Huppert; Elizabeth Hesse; Grace Kim; Michael Kim; Patricia Agreda; Nicole Quinn; Charlotte Gaydos Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2010-06-30 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Michelle L Pickett; Marlene D Melzer-Lange; Melissa K Miller; Seema Menon; Alexis M Vistocky; Amy L Drendel Journal: Pediatr Emerg Care Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 1.454
Authors: Marcia M Hobbs; Barbara van der Pol; Patricia Totten; Charlotte A Gaydos; Anna Wald; Terri Warren; Rachel L Winer; Robert L Cook; Carolyn D Deal; M Elizabeth Rogers; Julius Schachter; King K Holmes; David H Martin Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Charlotte A Gaydos; Mathilda R Barnes; Nicole Quinn; Mary Jett-Goheen; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2013-01-26 Impact factor: 3.519