Literature DB >> 12029276

Three-dimensional craniofacial reconstruction imaging.

Moschos A Papadopoulos1, Panayiotis K Christou, Payayiotis K Christou, Athanasios E Athanasiou, Peter Boettcher, Hans Florian Zeilhofer, Robert Sader, Nikolaos A Papadopulos.   

Abstract

This review article aims to describe and discuss the imaging techniques most commonly used in medicine and dentistry to obtain three-dimensional images of the craniofacial complex. Three-dimensional imaging techniques provide extensive possibilities for the detailed and precise analysis of the whole craniofacial complex, for virtual (on-screen) simulation and real simulation of orthognathic surgery cases on biomodels before treatment, as well as for the detailed evaluation of the effects of treatment. Laser scanning in combination with the stereolithographic biomodeling seems to be a very promising combination for three-dimensional imaging, although there is still considerable room for improvement. Constant efforts should be made in the direction of developing and enhancing the existing techniques as well as exploring the potential for developing new methods based on emerging sectors of technology.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12029276     DOI: 10.1067/moe.2002.121385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod        ISSN: 1079-2104


  15 in total

1.  Three-dimensional point localisation in low-dose X-ray images using stereo-photogrammetry.

Authors:  T S Douglas; C L Vaughan; S M Wynne
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  First and second branchial arch syndromes: multimodality approach.

Authors:  Elodie Senggen; Tarek Laswed; Jean-Yves Meuwly; Leonor Alamo Maestre; Bertrand Jaques; Reto Meuli; François Gudinchet
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-10-06

3.  Effects of two different functional appliances on root development of posterior teeth: activator vs. bite-jumping appliance.

Authors:  Gero Kinzinger; Susanna Savvaidis; Norbert Gülden; Björn Ludwig; Michael Knösel; Jörg Lisson
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  A computed tomography-based comparative cephalometric analysis of the Italian craniofacial pattern through 2,700 years.

Authors:  S Cappabianca; L Perillo; V Esposito; F Iaselli; G Tufano; T G Thanassoulas; M Montemarano; R Grassi; A Rotondo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Letter to The Editor: 3D CT Reconstruction of Mandibular Fractures.

Authors:  Arvind Ramanathan; Premalatha Shetty
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-12-22

6.  Evolution and trends in reconstructive facial surgery: an update.

Authors:  Oladimeji A Akadiri
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-05-13

7.  Stereolithographic models to guide orbital and oculoplastic surgery.

Authors:  Bijan Beigi; Tristan F W McMullan; Deepak Gupta; Mona Khandwala
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  [Evaluation of individual ceramic implants made of Bioverit with CAD/CAM technology to reconstruct multidimensional craniofacial defects of the human skull].

Authors:  H Siebert; P Schleier; J Beinemann; W Fried; W Zenk; D Schumann
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2006-05

9.  Factors influencing the accuracy of cephalometric prediction of soft tissue profile changes following orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Olga-Elpis Kolokitha; Evangelia Chatzistavrou
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-07-07

10.  A Protocol to Reduce Interobserver Variability in the Computed Tomography Measurement of Orbital Floor Fractures.

Authors:  Chuan Han Ang; Jin Rong Low; Jia Yi Shen; Elijah Zheng Yang Cai; Eileen Chor Hoong Hing; Yiong Huak Chan; Gangadhara Sundar; Thiam Chye Lim
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2015-02-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.