Literature DB >> 26576233

A Protocol to Reduce Interobserver Variability in the Computed Tomography Measurement of Orbital Floor Fractures.

Chuan Han Ang1, Jin Rong Low2, Jia Yi Shen2, Elijah Zheng Yang Cai2, Eileen Chor Hoong Hing2, Yiong Huak Chan3, Gangadhara Sundar4, Thiam Chye Lim5.   

Abstract

Orbital fracture detection and size determination from computed tomography (CT) scans affect the decision to operate, the type of surgical implant used, and postoperative outcomes. However, the lack of standardization of radiological signs often leads to the false-positive detection of orbital fractures, while nonstandardized landmarks lead to inaccurate defect measurements. We aim to design a novel protocol for CT measurement of orbital floor fractures and evaluate the interobserver variability on CT scan images. Qualitative aspects of this protocol include identifying direct and indirect signs of orbital fractures on CT scan images. Quantitative aspects of this protocol include measuring the surface area of pure orbital floor fractures using computer software. In this study, 15 independent observers without clinical experience in orbital fracture detection and measurement measured the orbital floor fractures of three randomly selected patients following the protocol. The time required for each measurement was recorded. The intraclass correlation coefficient of the surface area measurements is 0.999 (0.997-1.000) with p-value < 0.001. This suggests that any observer measuring the surface area will obtain a similar estimation of the fractured surface area. The maximum error limit was 0.901 cm(2) which is less than the margin of error of 1 cm(2) in mesh trimming for orbital reconstruction. The average duration required for each measurement was 3 minutes 19 seconds (ranging from 1 minute 35 seconds to 5 minutes). Measurements performed with our novel protocol resulted in minimal interobserver variability. This protocol is effective and generated reproducible results, is easy to teach and utilize, and its findings can be interpreted easily.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computed tomography; education; imaging; maxillofacial trauma; orbital fracture

Year:  2015        PMID: 26576233      PMCID: PMC4631555          DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1399800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr        ISSN: 1943-3875


  37 in total

Review 1.  Computed tomography pseudofractures of the mid face and skull base.

Authors:  S E J Connor; G Tan; R Fernando; N Chaudhury
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  Intrarater reliability in the ultrasound diagnosis of medial and lateral orbital wall fractures with a curved array transducer.

Authors:  Siegfried Jank; Martina Deibl; Heinrich Strobl; Andreas Oberrauch; Alessandro Nicasi; Martin Missmann; Gerd Bodner
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  A computer-based method for calculation of orbital floor fractures from coronal computed tomography scans.

Authors:  O Ploder; C Klug; M Voracek; W Backfrieder; M Tschabitscher; C Czerny; A Baumann
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Computational area measurement of orbital floor fractures: reliability, accuracy and rapidity.

Authors:  Thomas Schouman; Delphine S Courvoisier; Benoit Imholz; Christopher Van Issum; Paolo Scolozzi
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Relationship between the extent of fracture and the degree of enophthalmos in isolated blowout fractures of the medial orbital wall.

Authors:  H R Jin; S O Shin; M J Choo; Y S Choi
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Intraoperative computed tomography with the mobile CT Tomoscan M during surgical treatment of orbital fractures.

Authors:  F Hoelzle; M Klein; O Schwerdtner; T Lueth; J Albrecht; N Hosten; R Felix; J Bier
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 7.  Clinical recommendations for repair of isolated orbital floor fractures: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors:  Michael A Burnstine
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Follow-up study of treatment of orbital floor fractures: relation of clinical data and software-based CT-analysis.

Authors:  O Ploder; M Oeckher; C Klug; M Voracek; A Wagner; G Burggasser; A Baumann; C Czerny
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.789

9.  Analysis of orbital bone fractures: a 12-year study of 391 patients.

Authors:  Kun Hwang; Sun Hye You; In Ah Sohn
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.046

10.  Post-traumatic orbit evaluation by three-dimensional surface reconstructions.

Authors:  A Grivas; P N Manson; M W Vannier; A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.790

View more
  2 in total

1.  Computer-Aided Fracture Size Measurement in Orbital Fractures-An Alternative to Manual Evaluation.

Authors:  Mikko Saloniemi; Valtteri Lehtinen; Johanna Snäll
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-10-07

2.  Predictors of enophthalmos among adult patients with pure orbital blowout fractures.

Authors:  Suraya Ahmad Nasir; Roszalina Ramli; Nazimi Abd Jabar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.