Literature DB >> 12023148

The effect of beam energy and number of fields on photon-based IMRT for deep-seated targets.

Andrea Pirzkall1, Mark P Carol, Barby Pickett, Ping Xia, Mack Roach, Lynn J Verhey.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the influence of energy and number of beams on nontarget dose when using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to treat deep-seated targets. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten patients with prostate cancer (36-226 cc) treated locally to 75.6 Gy were studied. IMRT plans were created for 6-, 10-, and 18-MV photons using 4, 6, 9, and 11 coplanar nonopposed fields. Plans, normalized to cover 95% of the target volume, were analyzed using: (a) conformity index (CI) at 105%, 100%, 95%, 90%, 80%, 70%, 50% of prescribed dose; (b) prescription isodose line (PI); (c) minimum dose to target (Tar(min)); (d) maximum dose to tissue (Tis(max)); (e) dose to rectum/bladder/penis bulb; (f) integral nontarget dose (ID). Because CI evaluates dose independent of location, tissue also was divided into "near region" (NR: 1-cm-thick shell surrounding target) and "far region" (FR: tissue minus NR) volumes that were evaluated at the same levels as CI.
RESULTS: The target and sensitive structure metrics were the same for all plans. However, although there was little difference in NR volume exposed to dose, regardless of energy or number of fields, there was a significant increase in FR volume exposed to dose, at all levels, for low energy/few field plans compared to high energy/many fields (e.g., > 50 cc >or= 65 Gy). This effect disappeared with >or= 9 fields regardless of energy.
CONCLUSION: With IMRT, the use of 6 MV photons with less than 9 fields may result in an increase in dose in regions distant from the target volume (e.g., near the skin surface), even though the CI and sensitive structure metrics may indicate good conformance of high dose to the target volume itself. The clinical significance of this increased dose distant from the target, in terms of complications, remains to be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12023148     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02750-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  31 in total

1.  Effect of photon-beam energy on VMAT and IMRT treatment plan quality and dosimetric accuracy for advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marlies Pasler; Dietmar Georg; Holger Wirtz; Johannes Lutterbach
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 2.  Current status of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

Authors:  Kazuo Hatano; Hitoshi Araki; Mitsuhiro Sakai; Takashi Kodama; Naoki Tohyama; Tohru Kawachi; Masaharu Imazeki; Takayuki Shimizu; Tsutomu Iwase; Minoru Shinozuka; Hideyo Ishigaki
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  The effect of 6 and 15 MV on intensity-modulated radiation therapy prostate cancer treatment: plan evaluation, tumour control probability and normal tissue complication probability analysis, and the theoretical risk of secondary induced malignancies.

Authors:  M Hussein; S Aldridge; T Guerrero Urbano; A Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Dosimetric influence of photon beam energy and number of arcs on volumetric modulated arc therapy in carcinoma cervix: A planning study.

Authors:  Girigesh Yadav; Manindra Bhushan; Abhinav Dewan; Upasna Saxena; Lalit Kumar; Deepika Chauhan; Kothanda Raman; Swarupa Mitra; Mahammood Suhail
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-10-17

5.  A comprehensive comparison of IMRT and VMAT plan quality for prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Enzhuo M Quan; Xiaoqiang Li; Yupeng Li; Xiaochun Wang; Rajat J Kudchadker; Jennifer L Johnson; Deborah A Kuban; Andrew K Lee; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  New multileaf collimator with a leaf width of 5 mm improves plan quality compared to 10 mm in step-and-shoot IMRT of HNC using integrated boost procedure.

Authors:  Felix Zwicker; Henrik Hauswald; Simeon Nill; Bernhard Rhein; Christian Thieke; Falk Roeder; Carmen Timke; Angelika Zabel-du Bois; Jürgen Debus; Peter E Huber
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  New approach in lung cancer radiotherapy offers better normal tissue sparing.

Authors:  Ivaylo B Mihaylov
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 8.  A review of dosimetry studies on external-beam radiation treatment with respect to second cancer induction.

Authors:  X George Xu; Bryan Bednarz; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Comparison of conformal and intensity-modulated techniques for simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy of upper esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Wei-Hua Fu; Lu-Hua Wang; Zong-Mei Zhou; Jian-Rong Dai; Yi-Min Hu; Lu-Jun Zhao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  A dosimetric analysis of 6 MV versus 15 MV photon energy plans for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) of carcinoma of cervix.

Authors:  Atul Tyagi; Sanjay S Supe; Man P Singh
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2010-09-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.