Literature DB >> 12022981

Perioperative resting pressure predicts long-term postoperative function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Amy L Halverson1, Tracy L Hull, Feza Remzi, Jeffery P Hammel, Tom Schroeder, Victor W Fazio.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether perioperative manometry is useful in predicting long-term functional status after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). Prospectively collected perioperative anal manometry data from 1439 patients undergoing IPAA from 1986 to 2000 were compared to postoperative functional status at various time intervals from 6 months to 8 years after IPAA. A validated questionnaire was used to obtain information regarding restrictions of diet, work, social and sexual activity, urgency, fecal seepage or incontinence, energy level, satisfaction with surgery, and quality of life. The presence of seepage and the degree of incontinence were compared to the patient's perceived quality of life, health, energy level, and satisfaction with surgery. Low (<40 mm Hg) pre- and postoperative resting pressures were associated with increased seepage, pad use, and incontinence. Patients with low resting pressures also reported diminished quality of life, health, energy level, and satisfaction with surgery. There was a significant association (P < 0.001) between seepage and degree of incontinence and quality of health, quality of life, energy level, and level of satisfaction with surgery. Perioperative resting anal sphincter pressures greater than 40 mm Hg are associated with significantly better function and quality of life after ileal IPAA. Improved functional outcome is associated with better quality-of-life outcomes. Low preoperative resting pressures do not preclude successful outcome after IPAA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12022981     DOI: 10.1016/s1091-255x(01)00072-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  20 in total

1.  Limited influence of pouch function on quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  J Steens; W J Meijerink; A A Masclee; R A van Hogezand; G Griffioen; W J Post; W A Bemelman
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2000 May-Jun

2.  Assessment of anorectal function after mucosal proctectomy and endorectal ileal pullthrough for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  M Stelzner; E W Fonkalsrud
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Anal sphincter function after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and endorectal ileoanal pull-through.

Authors:  J M Becker
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1984-05

4.  Long-term results of the ileoanal pouch procedure.

Authors:  P W Marcello; P L Roberts; D J Schoetz; J A Coller; J J Murray; M C Veidenheimer
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1993-05

Review 5.  Predicting the functional result of anastomoses to the anus: the paradox of preoperative anal resting pressure.

Authors:  J M Church; R Saad; T Schroeder; V W Fazio; I C Lavery; J R Oakley; J W Milsom; W Tuckson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Motor determinants of incontinence after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  A Ferrara; J H Pemberton; R L Grotz; R B Hanson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Long-term results.

Authors:  J H Pemberton; K A Kelly; R W Beart; R R Dozois; B G Wolff; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Anal and ileal pouch manometric measurements before ileostomy closure are related to functional outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  N A Scott; J H Pemberton; D C Barkel; B G Wolff
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Factors influencing bowel function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  D G Nasmyth; D Johnston; P G Godwin; M F Dixon; A Smith; N S Williams
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Ileoanal pouch procedures: clinical outcomes and quality-of-life assessment.

Authors:  S A Seidel; S E Peach; M Newman; K W Sharp
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 0.688

View more
  3 in total

1.  When Not to Pouch: Important Considerations for Patient Selection for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis.

Authors:  Shannon Chang; Bo Shen; Feza Remzi
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2017-08

Review 2.  Evolution of the restorative proctocolectomy and its effects on gastrointestinal hormones.

Authors:  Amosy E M'Koma; Paul E Wise; Roberta L Muldoon; David A Schwartz; Mary K Washington; Alan J Herline
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Ileal-anal pouches: A review of its history, indications, and complications.

Authors:  Kheng-Seong Ng; Simon Joseph Gonsalves; Peter Michael Sagar
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.