Literature DB >> 2758272

Anal and ileal pouch manometric measurements before ileostomy closure are related to functional outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

N A Scott1, J H Pemberton, D C Barkel, B G Wolff.   

Abstract

Anal canal length, and canal resting and squeeze pressures, ileal pouch capacity and pouch compliance were measured in 104 patients after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis but before ileostomy closure. The intention was to determine if such parameters were associated with late functional outcome after re-establishment of intestinal continuity. Functional outcome in terms of stool frequency (day and night), incontinence (day and night), perianal pad use, perianal skin irritation, and the use of constipating agents was assessed for all 104 patients 1 year or more (median 438 days) after ileostomy closure. A low mean anal sphincter resting pressure before ileostomy closure was associated with subsequent nocturnal incontinence (P less than 0.05) and, to a lesser extent, the need to use constipating agents (P = 0.08). Pouch compliance if low before ileostomy closure was associated with an increased frequency of nocturnal stool frequency after 1 year (P less than 0.05). Anal canal length, and sphincter squeeze pressure and pouch capacity before ileostomy closure were not related to subsequent functional outcome in these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2758272     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800760630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  14 in total

1.  Proctocolectomy and stapled ileo-anal anastomosis without mucosal proctectomy.

Authors:  E Landi; A Fianchini; L Landa; C Marmorale; G Corradini; S De Luca; V Piloni
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Determinants of ileoanal pouch function.

Authors:  M D Levitt; A A Lewis
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Reduced pouch capacitance due to gynaecological pathology.

Authors:  C T Speakman; P B Boulos
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Evaluation of vector manometry for characterization of functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  Andreas D Rink; Manfred Nagelschmidt; Irina Radinski; Karl-Heinz Vestweber
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-04-26       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  The use of an ileostomy connector to diminish the frequency of defecation prior to ileostomy closure in patients with a pelvic pouch.

Authors:  K Maeda; M Hashimoto; J Koh; O Yamamoto; Y Hosoda; Y Morikawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Contribution of gastrointestinal transit and pouch characteristics in determining pouch function.

Authors:  P A Goldberg; M A Kamm; R J Nicholls; G Morris; K E Britton
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Straight ileo-anal anastomosis with myectomy as an alternative to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  E Landi; L Landa; A Fianchini; C Marmorale; V Piloni
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Early results with restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  P E Burke; J Lappin; J Hyland
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1990 Sep-Dec       Impact factor: 1.568

9.  When Not to Pouch: Important Considerations for Patient Selection for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis.

Authors:  Shannon Chang; Bo Shen; Feza Remzi
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2017-08

10.  The role of pouch compliance measurement in the management of pouch dysfunction.

Authors:  Yasuko Maeda; María Elena Molina; Christine Norton; Simon D McLaughlin; Carolynne J Vaizey; Søren Laurberg; Susan K Clark
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.