Literature DB >> 12021813

The effect of perturbation acceleration and advance warning on the neck postural responses of seated subjects.

Gunter P Siegmund1, David J Sanderson, J Timothy Inglis.   

Abstract

The muscle and kinematic responses of subjects exposed to postural perturbations have been shown to vary with platform acceleration when this acceleration was covaried with platform velocity or displacement. The purpose of the current study was to isolate platform acceleration and examine its effect on the neck muscle response and head kinematics of seated subjects exposed to anterior perturbations. Thirty-six subjects (20 females, 16 males) underwent two blocks of 36 perturbations. Three different perturbations with peak accelerations of 7.7, 14.7, and 21.7 m/s(2) up to a common velocity of 0.5 m/s were used. In one block, subjects received an audible warning corresponding to the platform acceleration magnitude, and in the other block, no advance warning was given. Onset and amplitude of the sternocleidomastoid and cervical paraspinal muscle responses were measured using surface electromyography. Kinematic measures included linear and angular accelerations and displacements of the head. The results showed no differences in either the preperturbation posture or the muscle or kinematic responses between the warned and unwarned trials. Significant differences were observed in the onset and amplitude of the muscle and kinematic variables with perturbation acceleration, although these response differences were not linearly graded with perturbation acceleration. Gradation of muscle activation times has not been previously observed in postural perturbation studies, and their gradation with platform acceleration in the current study suggested that platform acceleration was a strong regulator of the reflex muscle response in postural perturbations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12021813     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1048-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  6 in total

1.  Deceleration affects anticipatory and reactive components of triggered postural responses.

Authors:  Mark G Carpenter; Alf Thorstensson; Andrew G Cresswell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  A feedback model explains the differential scaling of human postural responses to perturbation acceleration and velocity.

Authors:  Torrence D J Welch; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Head and neck control varies with perturbation acceleration but not jerk: implications for whiplash injuries.

Authors:  Gunter P Siegmund; Jean-Sébastien Blouin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Attenuation of human neck muscle activity following repeated imposed trunk-forward linear acceleration.

Authors:  Jean-Sébastien Blouin; Martin Descarreaux; Ariane Bélanger-Gravel; Martin Simoneau; Normand Teasdale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Ankle dorsiflexor strength relates to the ability to restore balance during a backward support surface translation.

Authors:  Masahiro Fujimoto; Wei-Li Hsu; Marjorie H Woollacott; Li-Shan Chou
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 6.  Muscle activity during low-speed rear impact.

Authors:  O'Driscoll Olive; Magnusson Marianne; Pope Malcolm Henry; Chow Daniel Hung-Kay
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2019-02-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.