Literature DB >> 12021590

An overview of neck node sonography.

Anil Ahuja1, Michael Ying.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: Gray scale and power Doppler sonography are commonly used to evaluate cervical lymph nodes. This study was undertaken to identify which of the features used in ultrasound of cervical lymph nodes is readily applicable in routine clinical practice.
METHODS: Two hundred and eight-six patients diagnosed with cervical lymphadenopathy were included in the study. The largest node in each patient was included in the study and the nature of the node was assessed by fine-needle aspiration cytology. Lymph nodes were assessed for their gray scale and Doppler sonographic features.
RESULTS: Metastatic, lymphomatous, and tuberculous nodes were round (63-94%) and without echogenic hilus (57-91%). Sharp borders were found in metastatic and lymphomatous nodes (56-100%), but uncommon in tuberculosis (49%). Capsular or mixed vascularity is common in metastatic, lymphomatous, and tuberculous nodes but not found in reactive nodes. Except metastatic nodes from papillary carcinoma of the thyroid that showed low resistance, metastatic nodes had a higher vascular resistance than reactive nodes. Micronodular echo pattern is common in lymphomatous nodes. Hyperechogenicity and punctate calcification are typical features for metastatic nodes from papillary carcinoma of the thyroid. Intranodal cystic necrosis, adjacent soft tissue edema, matting and displaced hilar vascularity are common features in tuberculosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Using gray scale and power Doppler sonography, metastatic, lymphomatous, and tuberculous nodes can be differentiated from reactive nodes. Metastatic nodes from papillary carcinoma, lymphoma, and tuberculosis can be identified. However, it is difficult to differentiate metastatic nodes from squamous cell carcinomas, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and infraclavicular carcinomas, and differentiate metastatic nodes (nonthyroid primary) from tuberculous lymphadenitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12021590     DOI: 10.1097/00004424-200206000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  16 in total

1.  Real-time ultrasound elastography: an assessment of enlarged cervical lymph nodes.

Authors:  Wu-Chia Lo; Po-Wen Cheng; Chi-Te Wang; Li-Jen Liao
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of high resolution ultrasound to differentiate neoplastic and non neoplastic causes of cervical lymphadenopathy.

Authors:  Vinayaka U S; Siddharudha Shivalli; Sheethal Rai; Arafat Haris; Rohit Madhurkar; Sandhya Hemraj
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-09-20

3.  Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound in discrimination between benign and malignant mediastinal and abdominal lymph nodes.

Authors:  Michael Hocke; Markus Menges; Theodor Topalidis; Christoph F Dietrich; Andreas Stallmach
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Reliability of sonoelastography in predicting pediatric cervical lymph node malignancy.

Authors:  Ossama M Zakaria; Ahmed Mousa; Reema AlSadhan; Tamer A Sultan; Ahmed F Eid; Mohamed Y Daoud; Asmaa Al-Taher; Hazem M Zakaria; Krishna Swaroop; Amr M El-Gibaly; Haytham Al-Arfaj; Essam M Abdelbary
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  Characterization of thyroid cancer in mouse models using high-frequency quantitative ultrasound techniques.

Authors:  Roberto J Lavarello; William R Ridgway; Sandhya S Sarwate; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Importance of Sonoelastography in Assessing Non-Thyroid Neck Masses.

Authors:  Mustafa Şahin; İdil Tatar; Aydın Kurt; Ömer Bayır; Güleser Saylam; Baki Hekimoğlu; Hakan Korkmaz
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-01

Review 7.  The role of ultrasound in the detection of cervical lymph node metastases in clinically N0 squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  P S Richards; T E Peacock
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 8.  Ultrasound of malignant cervical lymph nodes.

Authors:  A T Ahuja; M Ying; S Y Ho; G Antonio; Y P Lee; A D King; K T Wong
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 3.909

9.  Sonographic Evaluation of Cervical Lymphadenopathy; Comparison of Metastatic and Reactive Lymph Nodes in Patients With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using Gray Scale and Doppler Techniques.

Authors:  Mahyar Ghafoori; Amin Azizian; Zahra Pourrajabi; Hamed Vaseghi
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 0.212

Review 10.  Review of ultrasonography of malignant neck nodes: greyscale, Doppler, contrast enhancement and elastography.

Authors:  M Ying; K S S Bhatia; Y P Lee; H Y Yuen; A T Ahuja
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.