Literature DB >> 12020024

Monitoring and characterization of diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) resistance to spinosad.

J Z Zhao1, Y X Li, H L Collins, L Gusukuma-Minuto, R F L Mau, G D Thompson, A M Shelto.   

Abstract

Fourteen populations of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.), were collected from fields of crucifer vegetables in the United States, Mexico, and Thailand in 1999 and 2000 for susceptibility tests with spinosad. Most populations were susceptible to spinosad and similar to earlier baseline values, but populations from Thailand and Hawaii showed high levels of tolerance. A statewide survey in Hawaii in 2000 and 2001 indicated resistance problems on several islands. One colony collected in October 2000 from Pearl City, HI, was subjected to further selection pressure, using spinosad in the laboratory, and then was used as the resistant strain (Pearl-Sel) for other tests. Spray tests using the recommended field rates of spinosad on potted broccoli plants in the greenhouse confirmed that field control failures due to resistance were possible in the areas of these collections. Analysis of probit lines from F1 reciprocal crosses between the Pearl-Sel and S strain indicated that resistance to spinosad was inherited autosomally and was incompletely recessive. A direct test of monogenic inheritance based on the F1 x Pearl-Sel backcrosses suggested that resistance to spinosad was probably controlled by one locus. The synergists S,S,S-tributyl phosphorotrithioate and piperonyl butoxide did not enhance the toxicity of spinosad to the resistant colony, indicating metabolic mediated detoxification was probably not responsible for the spinosad resistance. Two field colonies in Hawaii that were resistant to spinosad were not cross-resistant to emamectin benzoate or indoxacarb. Resistance developed in Hawaii due to the continuous cultivation of crucifers in which as many as 50 applications of spinosad per year may have been made to a common population of P. xylostella in sequential plantings, although each grower might have used the labeled restrictions for resistance management. Resistance management strategies will need to address such cropping and pest management practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12020024     DOI: 10.1603/0022-0493-95.2.430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Entomol        ISSN: 0022-0493            Impact factor:   2.381


  30 in total

1.  Systemic use of spinosad to control the two-spotted spider mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) on tomatoes grown in rockwool.

Authors:  T Van Leeuwen; W Dermauw; M van de Veire; L Tirry
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.132

Review 2.  A review on the toxicity and non-target effects of macrocyclic lactones in terrestrial and aquatic environments.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Lumaret; Faiek Errouissi; Kevin Floate; Jörg Römbke; Keith Wardhaugh
Journal:  Curr Pharm Biotechnol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.837

3.  Esterase-mediated spinosad resistance in house flies Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae).

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Mingcheng Guo; Zhuo Ma; Chunmei You; Xiwu Gao; Xueyan Shi
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor α6 subunit mutation (G275V) found in a spinosad-resistant strain of the flower thrips, Frankliniella intonsa (Thysanoptera: Thripidae).

Authors:  Emika Hiruta; Misato Aizawa; Akio Nakano; Shoji Sonoda
Journal:  J Pestic Sci       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 1.519

5.  Eco-friendly pheromone dispensers-a green route to manage the European grapevine moth?

Authors:  Andrea Lucchi; Edith Ladurner; Andrea Iodice; Francesco Savino; Renato Ricciardi; Francesca Cosci; Giuseppe Conte; Giovanni Benelli
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Isolation of BAC clones containing conserved genes from libraries of three distantly related moths: a useful resource for comparative genomics of Lepidoptera.

Authors:  Yuji Yasukochi; Makiko Tanaka-Okuyama; Manabu Kamimura; Ryo Nakano; Yota Naito; Yukio Ishikawa; Ken Sahara
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-11-25

7.  EVALUATION OF SUBLETHAL EFFECTS OF Ipomoea cairica LINN. EXTRACT ON LIFE HISTORY TRAITS OF DENGUE VECTORS.

Authors:  Wan Fatma Zuharah; Rattanam Ahbirami; Hamady Dieng; Maniam Thiagaletchumi; Nik Fadzly
Journal:  Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 1.846

8.  Transcripts of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit gene Pxylα6 with premature stop codons are associated with spinosad resistance in diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella.

Authors:  Frank D Rinkevich; Mao Chen; Anthony M Shelton; Jeffrey G Scott
Journal:  Invert Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-25

9.  The invertebrate pharmacology of insecticides acting at nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

Authors:  Andrew J Crossthwaite; Aurelien Bigot; Philippe Camblin; Jim Goodchild; Robert J Lind; Russell Slater; Peter Maienfisch
Journal:  J Pestic Sci       Date:  2017-08-20       Impact factor: 1.519

10.  Mis-spliced transcripts of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha6 are associated with field evolved spinosad resistance in Plutella xylostella (L.).

Authors:  Simon W Baxter; Mao Chen; Anna Dawson; Jian-Zhou Zhao; Heiko Vogel; Anthony M Shelton; David G Heckel; Chris D Jiggins
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.