Literature DB >> 22039795

A review on the toxicity and non-target effects of macrocyclic lactones in terrestrial and aquatic environments.

Jean-Pierre Lumaret1, Faiek Errouissi, Kevin Floate, Jörg Römbke, Keith Wardhaugh.   

Abstract

The avermectins, milbemycins and spinosyns are collectively referred to as macrocyclic lactones (MLs) which comprise several classes of chemicals derived from cultures of soil micro-organisms. These compounds are extensively and increasingly used in veterinary medicine and agriculture. Due to their potential effects on non-target organisms, large amounts of information on their impact in the environment has been compiled in recent years, mainly caused by legal requirements related to their marketing authorization or registration. The main objective of this paper is to critically review the present knowledge about the acute and chronic ecotoxicological effects of MLs on organisms, mainly invertebrates, in the terrestrial and aquatic environment. Detailed information is presented on the mode-of-action as well as the ecotoxicity of the most important compounds representing the three groups of MLs. This information, based on more than 360 references, is mainly provided in nine tables, presenting the effects of abamectin, ivermectin, eprinomectin, doramectin, emamectin, moxidectin, and spinosad on individual species of terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates as well as plants and algae. Since dung dwelling organisms are particularly important non-targets, as they are exposed via dung from treated animals over their whole life-cycle, the information on the effects of MLs on dung communities is compiled in an additional table. The results of this review clearly demonstrate that regarding environmental impacts many macrocyclic lactones are substances of high concern particularly with larval instars of invertebrates. Recent studies have also shown that susceptibility varies with life cycle stage and impacts can be mitigated by using MLs when these stages are not present. However information on the environmental impact of the MLs is scattered across a wide range of specialised scientific journals with research focusing mainly on ivermectin and to a lesser extent on abamectin doramectin and moxidectin. By comparison, information on compounds such as eprinomectin, emamectin and selamectin is still relatively scarce.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22039795      PMCID: PMC3409360          DOI: 10.2174/138920112800399257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Pharm Biotechnol        ISSN: 1389-2010            Impact factor:   2.837


  156 in total

1.  Behavioral effects of ivermectin in a freshwater oligochaete, Lumbriculus variegatus.

Authors:  J Ding; C D Drewes; W H Hsu
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.742

2.  The disposition of ivermectin in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).

Authors:  T Høy; E Horsberg; I Nafstad
Journal:  Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  1990-10

3.  Development, pharmacokinetics and mode of action of ivermectin.

Authors:  I H Sutherland; W C Campbell
Journal:  Acta Leiden       Date:  1990

4.  The spinosyn family of insecticides: realizing the potential of natural products research.

Authors:  Herbert A Kirst
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Ivermectin therapy and degradation of cattle faeces.

Authors:  D E Jacobs; J G Pilkington; M A Fisher; M T Fox
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1988-10-08       Impact factor: 2.695

6.  Monitoring of diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) resistance to spinosad, indoxacarb, and emamectin benzoate.

Authors:  J Z Zhao; H L Collins; Y X Li; R F L Mau; G D Thompson; M Hertlein; J T Andaloro; R Boykin; A M Shelton
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Laboratory evaluation of pyriproxyfen and spinosad, alone and in combination, against Aedes aegypti larvae.

Authors:  Frederic Darriet; Vincent Corbel
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.278

8.  Spinosad toxicity to pollinators and associated risk.

Authors:  Monte A Mayes; Gary D Thompson; Brian Husband; Mark M Miles
Journal:  Rev Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 7.563

9.  Effects of orally administered spinosad (Comfortis) in dogs on adult and immature stages of the cat flea (Ctenocephalides felis).

Authors:  Byron L Blagburn; David R Young; Columba Moran; Jeffery A Meyer; Anna Leigh-Heffron; Tandy Paarlberg; Alan G Zimmermann; Daniel Mowrey; Scott Wiseman; Daniel E Snyder
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 2.738

10.  Disintegration of dung pats from cattle treated with the ivermectin anthelmintic bolus, or the biocontrol agent Duddingtonia flagrans.

Authors:  S O Dimander; J Höglund; P J Waller
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.695

View more
  41 in total

Review 1.  Effect of macrocyclic lactones on nontarget coprophilic organisms: a review.

Authors:  M Junco; L E Iglesias; M F Sagués; I Guerrero; S Zegbi; C A Saumell
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 2.  Veterinary pharmaceuticals in aqueous systems and associated effects: an update.

Authors:  Samuel Obimakinde; Olalekan Fatoki; Beatrice Opeolu; Olatunde Olatunji
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Acute and chronic sensitivity, avoidance behavior and sensitive life stages of bullfrog tadpoles exposed to the biopesticide abamectin.

Authors:  Ana M Vasconcelos; Michiel A Daam; Liliana R A dos Santos; Ana L M Sanches; Cristiano V M Araújo; Evaldo L G Espíndola
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Lethal and sub-lethal effects of select macrocyclic lactones insecticides on forager worker honey bees under laboratory experimental conditions.

Authors:  Gamal A M Abdu-Allah; Barry R Pittendrigh
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Aquatic environmental safety assessment and inhibition mechanism of chemicals for targeting Microcystis aeruginosa.

Authors:  Xiao-Bo Yu; Kai Hao; Fei Ling; Gao-Xue Wang
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Gene Replacement for the Generation of Designed Novel Avermectin Derivatives with Enhanced Acaricidal and Nematicidal Activities.

Authors:  Jun Huang; An-Liang Chen; Hui Zhang; Zhen Yu; Mei-Hong Li; Na Li; Jia-Tan Lin; Hua Bai; Ji-Dong Wang; Yu-Guo Zheng
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Temperature increases, hypoxia, and changes in food availability affect immunological biomarkers in the marine mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis.

Authors:  M G Parisi; M Mauro; G Sarà; M Cammarata
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 2.200

8.  Albendazole in environment: faecal concentrations in lambs and impact on lower development stages of helminths and seed germination.

Authors:  Lukáš Prchal; Radka Podlipná; Jiří Lamka; Tereza Dědková; Lenka Skálová; Ivan Vokřál; Lenka Lecová; Tomáš Vaněk; Barbora Szotáková
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 9.  Moxidectin and the avermectins: Consanguinity but not identity.

Authors:  Roger Prichard; Cécile Ménez; Anne Lespine
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 4.077

10.  Behavioral and mutagenic biomarkers in tadpoles exposed to different abamectin concentrations.

Authors:  Diogo Ferreira do Amaral; Mateus Flores Montalvão; Bruna de Oliveira Mendes; André Luis da Silva Castro; Guilherme Malafaia
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.