Literature DB >> 24755045

Recovery of paretic lower extremity loading ability and physical function in the first six months after stroke.

Vicki Stemmons Mercer1, Janet Kues Freburger2, Zhaoyu Yin3, John S Preisser3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate poststroke recovery of paretic lower extremity loading, walking ability, and self-reported physical function; and to identify subject characteristics associated with recovery.
DESIGN: Inception cohort study, with testing at monthly intervals from 1 to 6 months poststroke.
SETTING: Medical center and research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Volunteer sample of individuals with first-ever, unilateral, noncerebellar stroke (N=33). A total of 78 individuals underwent screening, and 45 were found to be eligible. Of these, 8 declined participation, 2 were excluded because of deteriorating cognitive status, and 2 were lost to follow-up. The remaining 33 individuals enrolled in the study, and 30 (91%) completed the study.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes were loading of the paretic lower extremity when standing up from a chair, self-selected gait speed (GS), and Physical Functioning Index.
RESULTS: Data analyses using linear mixed models indicated that subjects improved over time for all outcomes. Baseline Fugl-Meyer (FM) lower extremity motor scale score was a predictor of immediate poststroke performance for paretic lower extremity loading and self-selected GS, and a predictor of recovery rate for paretic lower extremity loading. Factors identified as having significant effects on performance at 6 months poststroke were baseline FM lower extremity motor scale score for paretic lower extremity loading and self-selected GS and baseline star cancellation score (from the Behavioral Inattention Test) for paretic lower extremity loading.
CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with better baseline paretic lower extremity motor function have better ability to load that extremity during functional activities and faster walking speeds, and these advantages are still present at 6 months poststroke. Individuals with severe visuospatial neglect demonstrate less ability to load the paretic leg during functional activities at 6 months poststroke.
Copyright © 2014 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gait; Recovery of function; Rehabilitation; Stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24755045      PMCID: PMC4112143          DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.03.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  48 in total

Review 1.  Impact of neglect on functional outcome after stroke: a review of methodological issues and recent research findings.

Authors:  M Jehkonen; M Laihosalo; J E Kettunen
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  Prevalence of stroke and stroke-related disability. Estimates from the Auckland stroke studies.

Authors:  R Bonita; N Solomon; J B Broad
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Symmetry of ground reaction forces and muscle activity in asymptomatic subjects during walking, sit-to-stand, and stand-to-sit tasks.

Authors:  David R Burnett; Naira H Campbell-Kyureghyan; Patricia B Cerrito; Peter M Quesada
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 2.368

4.  Does clinic-measured gait speed differ from gait speed measured in the community in people with stroke?

Authors:  Denise Taylor; Caroline M Stretton; Suzie Mudge; Nick Garrett
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.477

5.  Admission motor impairment as a predictor of physical disability after stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  J Chae; M Johnston; H Kim; R Zorowitz
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.159

6.  A short screening test for visual neglect in stroke patients.

Authors:  P Halligan; B Wilson; J Cockburn
Journal:  Int Disabil Stud       Date:  1990 Jul-Sep

7.  Timed walking tests correlate with daily step activity in persons with stroke.

Authors:  Suzie Mudge; N Susan Stott
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 8.  The global burden of stroke and need for a continuum of care.

Authors:  Bo Norrving; Brett Kissela
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke.

Authors:  J Sanford; J Moreland; L R Swanson; P W Stratford; C Gowland
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1993-07

10.  Measurement of paretic-lower-extremity loading and weight transfer after stroke.

Authors:  Vicki Stemmons Mercer; Janet Kues Freburger; Shuo-Hsiu Chang; Jama L Purser
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2009-05-21
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  A Narrative Review of Alternate Gait Training Using Knee-ankle-foot Orthosis in Stroke Patients with Severe Hemiparesis.

Authors:  Hiroaki Abe; Kei Kadowaki; Naohide Tsujimoto; Toru Okanuka
Journal:  Phys Ther Res       Date:  2021-12-06

2.  Spanish Transcultural Adaptation and Validity of the Behavioral Inattention Test.

Authors:  Ángel Sánchez-Cabeza; Elisabet Huertas-Hoyas; Nuria Máximo-Bocanegra; Marta Pérez-de-Heredia-Torres; Jorge Alegre-Ayala
Journal:  Occup Ther Int       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 1.448

3.  Baseline predictors of treatment gains in peak propulsive force in individuals poststroke.

Authors:  HaoYuan Hsiao; Jill S Higginson; Stuart A Binder-Macleod
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 4.262

4.  Step Number and Aerobic Minute Exercise Prescription and Progression in Stroke: A Roadmap.

Authors:  Sue Peters; Tara Klassen; Amy Schneeberg; Sean Dukelow; Mark Bayley; Michael Hill; Sepideh Pooyania; Jennifer Yao; Janice Eng
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.919

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.